On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:07:27 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/foreign/valist/VaListTest.java line 706:
>>
>>> 704: vaList.skip(BigPoint_LAYOUT);
>>> 705: assertEquals((long) vaList.vargAsLong(C_LONG), 42);
>>> 706: })},
>>
>> Looks
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 03:28:56 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either registers or on
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:04:33 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> Nick Gasson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> No variadic upcalls
>>
>> Change-Id: Ibf91c570c88be2587e9e23240477c4a5cc56b4c5
>> CustomizedGitHooks: yes
>
>
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 03:28:56 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either registers or on
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 03:28:56 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either registers or on
> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
> in either registers or on the stack following the normal calling
> convention. To
