On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:32:18 GMT, Igor Veresov wrote:
> Do we need to keep this flag?
Exactly, the flag should be removed.
Thanks,
Yang
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3615
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 03:50:54 GMT, Yi Yang wrote:
>> The JDK codebase re-created many variants of checkIndex(`grep -I -r
>> 'cehckIndex' jdk/`). A notable variant is java.nio.Buffer.checkIndex, which
>> annotated with @IntrinsicCandidate and it only has a corresponding C1
>> intrinsic version.
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 03:50:54 GMT, Yi Yang wrote:
>> The JDK codebase re-created many variants of checkIndex(`grep -I -r
>> 'cehckIndex' jdk/`). A notable variant is java.nio.Buffer.checkIndex, which
>> annotated with @IntrinsicCandidate and it only has a corresponding C1
>> intrinsic version.
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 03:50:54 GMT, Yi Yang wrote:
>> The JDK codebase re-created many variants of checkIndex(`grep -I -r
>> 'cehckIndex' jdk/`). A notable variant is java.nio.Buffer.checkIndex, which
>> annotated with @IntrinsicCandidate and it only has a corresponding C1
>> intrinsic version.
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 03:50:54 GMT, Yi Yang wrote:
>> The JDK codebase re-created many variants of checkIndex(`grep -I -r
>> 'cehckIndex' jdk/`). A notable variant is java.nio.Buffer.checkIndex, which
>> annotated with @IntrinsicCandidate and it only has a corresponding C1
>> intrinsic version.
> The JDK codebase re-created many variants of checkIndex(`grep -I -r
> 'cehckIndex' jdk/`). A notable variant is java.nio.Buffer.checkIndex, which
> annotated with @IntrinsicCandidate and it only has a corresponding C1
> intrinsic version.
>
> In fact, there is an utility method
>
