On Tue, 4 May 2021 20:45:43 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This fix addresses a change in TestNG behavior for the Before/AfterGroups
> annotations that was introduced via
> https://github.com/cbeust/testng/pull/2167. The tests have been verified
> against the latest TestNG
On Tue, 4 May 2021 22:49:22 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
>> Ah. I was just thinking of consistency with other tests. Up to you.
>
> I think your milage will vary depending on the author and the IDE being used.
> My primary concern was to address the issue for the failing test and
> Intellij
On Tue, 4 May 2021 22:44:18 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> That's IntelliJ magic. I can update if you prefer and can let IntelliJ
>> optimize all of the imports
>
> Ah. I was just thinking of consistency with other tests. Up to you.
I think your milage will vary depending on the author and
On Tue, 4 May 2021 22:42:57 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/io/InputStream/NullInputStream.java line 33:
>>
>>> 31: import java.io.InputStream;
>>> 32:
>>> 33: import static org.testng.Assert.*;
>>
>> Would it not be more standard to put the new imports just after this import?
>>
On Tue, 4 May 2021 22:36:29 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This fix addresses a change in TestNG behavior for the Before/AfterGroups
>> annotations that was introduced via
>> https://github.com/cbeust/testng/pull/2167. The tests have been verified
>> against the latest
On Tue, 4 May 2021 20:45:43 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This fix addresses a change in TestNG behavior for the Before/AfterGroups
> annotations that was introduced via
> https://github.com/cbeust/testng/pull/2167. The tests have been verified
> against the latest TestNG
Hi all,
This fix addresses a change in TestNG behavior for the Before/AfterGroups
annotations that was introduced via
https://github.com/cbeust/testng/pull/2167. The tests have been verified
against the latest TestNG release and continue to run with the current TestNG
release used by
