Re: RFR: 8271599: Javadoc of floorDiv() and floorMod() families is inaccurate in some places [v4]

2021-08-04 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 22:44:57 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti wrote: >> Hello, >> >> please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in >> all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections. >> >> Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc

Re: RFR: 8271599: Javadoc of floorDiv() and floorMod() families is inaccurate in some places [v4]

2021-08-04 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 00:57:16 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8271599: Javadoc of floorDiv() and floorMod() families is inaccurate in >> some places > > Marked as

Re: RFR: 8271599: Javadoc of floorDiv() and floorMod() families is inaccurate in some places [v4]

2021-08-03 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 22:44:57 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti wrote: >> Hello, >> >> please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in >> all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections. >> >> Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc

Re: RFR: 8271599: Javadoc of floorDiv() and floorMod() families is inaccurate in some places [v4]

2021-08-03 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
> Hello, > > please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in > all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections. > > Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc >> "the / operator returns the integer closest to zero" > >

Re: RFR: 8271599: Javadoc of floorDiv() and floorMod() families is inaccurate in some places [v4]

2021-08-03 Thread Joe Darcy
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 22:41:52 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti wrote: >> Hello, >> >> please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in >> all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections. >> >> Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc

Re: RFR: 8271599: Javadoc of floorDiv() and floorMod() families is inaccurate in some places [v3]

2021-08-03 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 22:37:12 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti wrote: >> Hello, >> >> please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in >> all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections. >> >> Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc

Re: RFR: 8271599: Javadoc of floorDiv() and floorMod() families is inaccurate in some places [v3]

2021-08-03 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
> Hello, > > please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in > all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections. > > Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc >> "the / operator returns the integer closest to zero" > >

Re: RFR: 8271599: Javadoc of floorDiv() and floorMod() families is inaccurate in some places [v2]

2021-08-03 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
> Hello, > > please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in > all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections. > > Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc >> "the / operator returns the integer closest to zero" > >

Re: RFR: 8271599: Javadoc of floorDiv() and floorMod() families is inaccurate in some places

2021-08-03 Thread Joe Darcy
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 22:34:58 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti wrote: > Hello, > > please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in > all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections. > > Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc >> "the

RFR: 8271599: Javadoc of floorDiv() and floorMod() families is inaccurate in some places

2021-08-02 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
Hello, please review the changes in documentation of floorDiv() and floorMod() in all their variants. Some are clarifications, some are corrections. Here's an example of a confusing formulation in the current doc > "the / operator returns the integer closest to zero" Literally, the integer