On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:40:52 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> In #4738 we removed the `checkIndex(value, count)` call in `ASB.charAt` to
>> avoid potentially getting two bounds checks in the UTF-16 case. Problem is
>> this optimization cause a regression since `StringUTF16.charAt(..)` checks
>> `
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:40:52 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> In #4738 we removed the `checkIndex(value, count)` call in `ASB.charAt` to
>> avoid potentially getting two bounds checks in the UTF-16 case. Problem is
>> this optimization cause a regression since `StringUTF16.charAt(..)` checks
>> `
> In #4738 we removed the `checkIndex(value, count)` call in `ASB.charAt` to
> avoid potentially getting two bounds checks in the UTF-16 case. Problem is
> this optimization cause a regression since `StringUTF16.charAt(..)` checks
> `index` against the length of the `value` array and not `count`
> In #4738 we removed the `checkIndex(value, count)` call in `ASB.charAt` to
> avoid potentially getting two bounds checks in the UTF-16 case. Problem is
> this optimization cause a regression since `StringUTF16.charAt(..)` checks
> `index` against the length of the `value` array and not `count`
> In #4738 we removed the `checkIndex(value, count)` call in `ASB.charAt` to
> avoid potentially getting two bounds checks in the UTF-16 case. Problem is
> this optimization cause a regression since `StringUTF16.charAt(..)` checks
> `index` against the length of the `value` array and not `count`
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:26:32 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> In #4738 we removed the `checkIndex(value, count)` call in `ASB.charAt` to
> avoid potentially getting two bounds checks in the UTF-16 case. Problem is
> this optimization cause a regression since `StringUTF16.charAt(..)` checks
> `inde
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:26:32 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> In #4738 we removed the `checkIndex(value, count)` call in `ASB.charAt` to
> avoid potentially getting two bounds checks in the UTF-16 case. Problem is
> this optimization cause a regression since `StringUTF16.charAt(..)` checks
> `inde
In #4738 we removed the `checkIndex(value, count)` call in `ASB.charAt` to
avoid potentially getting two bounds checks in the UTF-16 case. Problem is this
optimization cause a regression since `StringUTF16.charAt(..)` checks `index`
against the length of the `value` array and not `count`.
A cor
