Re: RFR: 8277048: Tiny improvements to the specification text for java.util.Properties.load

2021-11-12 Thread Naoto Sato
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 12:25:20 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote: > Please review this simple two-hunk fix to the documentation comment of > java.util.Properties#load(java.io.Reader). The first hunk (line/lines) is a > suggestion. I believe it reads better since the plurality is more idiomatic; > native

Re: RFR: 8277048: Tiny improvements to the specification text for java.util.Properties.load

2021-11-12 Thread Iris Clark
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 12:25:20 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote: > Please review this simple two-hunk fix to the documentation comment of > java.util.Properties#load(java.io.Reader). The first hunk (line/lines) is a > suggestion. I believe it reads better since the plurality is more idiomatic; > native

Re: RFR: 8277048: Tiny improvements to the specification text for java.util.Properties.load

2021-11-12 Thread Roger Riggs
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 12:25:20 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote: > Please review this simple two-hunk fix to the documentation comment of > java.util.Properties#load(java.io.Reader). The first hunk (line/lines) is a > suggestion. I believe it reads better since the plurality is more idiomatic; > native

RFR: 8277048: Tiny improvements to the specification text for java.util.Properties.load

2021-11-12 Thread Pavel Rappo
Please review this simple two-hunk fix to the documentation comment of java.util.Properties#load(java.io.Reader). The first hunk (line/lines) is a suggestion. I believe it reads better since the plurality is more idiomatic; native English speakers should correct me if I'm wrong. The second hunk