On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 21:06:35 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> While it is true for completeness, I would limit the addition of new method
>> as little as possible, because there are already several ways to obtain a
>> Locale object.
>
> As with other varargs method calls, it is possible to pass an
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 16:00:14 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Locale.java line 819:
>>
>>> 817: * @since 19
>>> 818: */
>>> 819: public static Locale of(String... fields) {
>>
>> Arguably, there should be `Locale.of` overloads taking 0 to 4
On Sun, 27 Mar 2022 08:45:01 GMT, ExE Boss wrote:
>> Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fixed a build failure
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Locale.java line 819:
>
>> 817: * @since 19
>> 818:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 11:30:53 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> One suggestion As part of the PR, we should probably update
> test/jdk/java/util/Locale/LocaleTest.java. or perhaps add a new test for
> Locale.of() for completeness.
Thanks, Lance. Sure, I will add some new unit tests for the new
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 22:51:23 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Proposing to deprecate the constructors in the `java.util.Locale` class.
>> There is already a factory method and a builder to return singletons, so
>> there is no need to have constructors anymore unless one purposefully wants
>> to
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 22:51:23 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Proposing to deprecate the constructors in the `java.util.Locale` class.
>> There is already a factory method and a builder to return singletons, so
>> there is no need to have constructors anymore unless one purposefully wants
>> to
> Proposing to deprecate the constructors in the `java.util.Locale` class.
> There is already a factory method and a builder to return singletons, so
> there is no need to have constructors anymore unless one purposefully wants
> to create `ill-formed` Locale objects, which is discouraged. We
