On 31 Jul 2015, at 04:47, Stuart Marks stuart.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
On 7/28/15 5:50 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
I agree that if we make a policy decision here, we can change it and the
compatibility impact is minimal.
Since there already exists an implicit policy governed by like 99.9% of
On 7/28/15 5:50 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
I agree that if we make a policy decision here, we can change it and the
compatibility impact is minimal.
Since there already exists an implicit policy governed by like 99.9% of the
existing behaviour i do not see the need to be explicit about that
On 27 Jul 2015, at 20:53, Martin Buchholz marti...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Paul Sandoz paul.san...@oracle.com wrote:
My guiding principle here was that argument validation should not result in
side-effects. Thus the state of a collection should remain unchanged
Hi Paul,
I'm mildly opposed to this change - I added comments to the bug.
It looks like you are not the only one. I am outnumbered :-)
The behaviour of ArrayList.remove, and also ArrayList.removeRange, are
outliers [*]. It?s also a rather obscure difference behaviour with likely
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Paul Sandoz paul.san...@oracle.com wrote:
My guiding principle here was that argument validation should not result
in side-effects. Thus the state of a collection should remain unchanged if
an exception is thrown due to an invalid argument of an operation.
On 24 Jul 2015, at 20:30, Martin Buchholz marti...@google.com wrote:
Hi Steve, pleased to meet you!
(are you a new maintainer of java.util collections?)
I suggested that Steve look at some “simple” issues to build up credits for a
committer role, so i threw this and some others over the
Hello,
Please review the fix for JDK-8114832. I did what was suggested in the
comments in the bug report, moving the increment of modcount to the “right”
place.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8114832
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8114832
Hi Steve, pleased to meet you!
(are you a new maintainer of java.util collections?)
I'm mildly opposed to this change - I added comments to the bug.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Steve Drach steve.dr...@oracle.com
wrote:
Hello,
Please review the fix for JDK-8114832. I did what was
