Re: RFR: JDK-8225213: Backport jsr166 tck tests to jdk8u

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:38 PM Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > > On 05/06/2019 02:35, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:07 PM Andrew John Hughes > > wrote: > > > > > > I don't think this is the best approach. JDK-8146467 looks like a >

Re: RFR: JDK-8225213: Backport jsr166 tck tests to jdk8u

On 05/06/2019 02:35, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:07 PM Andrew John Hughes > wrote: > > > I don't think this is the best approach. JDK-8146467 looks like a pretty > clean snapshot of the tests from not long after 8u GA. It

Re: RFR: JDK-8225213: Backport jsr166 tck tests to jdk8u

On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:07 PM Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > I don't think this is the best approach. JDK-8146467 looks like a pretty > clean snapshot of the tests from not long after 8u GA. It doesn't > include any *9Test.java files for a start. It would seem better to start > with backporting

Re: RFR: JDK-8225213: Backport jsr166 tck tests to jdk8u

On 05/06/2019 01:15, Martin Buchholz wrote: > (Trying to correct my mistake of not having cc'ed jdk8u-dev) > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 5:15 PM Martin Buchholz > wrote: > > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: *Martin Buchholz (JBS)*

Re: RFR: JDK-8225213: Backport jsr166 tck tests to jdk8u

(Trying to correct my mistake of not having cc'ed jdk8u-dev) On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 5:15 PM Martin Buchholz wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Martin Buchholz (JBS) > Date: Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 5:11 PM > Subject: [JBS] {Commented} (JDK-8225213) Backport jsr166 tck tests

RFR: JDK-8225213: Backport jsr166 tck tests to jdk8u

-- Forwarded message - From: Martin Buchholz (JBS) Date: Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 5:11 PM Subject: [JBS] {Commented} (JDK-8225213) Backport jsr166 tck tests to jdk8u To: Martin Buchholz *commented* on [image: