On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:29:45 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
>> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
>> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
>> as
On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:29:45 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
>> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
>> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
>> as
> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
> as in Objects.toDefaultString(). This method is analagous t
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 23:20:37 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
>> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
>> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
>> as
> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
> as in Objects.toDefaultString(). This method is analagous t
> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
> as in Objects.toDefaultString(). This method is analagous t
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 18:48:48 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
>> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
>> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
>> as
> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
> as in Objects.toDefaultString(). This method is analagous t
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 02:57:10 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
>> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
>> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
>> as
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 02:57:10 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
>> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
>> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
>> as
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 02:22:33 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Respond to review feedback.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Objects.java line 170:
>
>> 168: * {@return a s
> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
> as in Objects.toDefaultString(). This method is analagous t
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 23:15:20 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
> as in
While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class, at
times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be used,
it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such as in
Objects.toDefaultString(). This method is analagous to System
14 matches
Mail list logo
