P.S. Sorry, not sure if changes like d62023 - {@literal d62023}
(see, e.g., ValueBoxGen24.java) are what expected; please correct me if
I'm wrong.
But something should be done; otherwise d62023 is interpreted as an
unknown HTML tag causing the errors.
Thanks,
Alexander
On 30.04.2015 14:31,
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for working through all these changes.
0) Is there an upstream version of any of this code? Making even
cosmetic changes
would make future versions harder to merge.
1) For files that we don't typically generate javadoc for, it is simpler
to avoid adding unnecessary
On 30/04/2015 14:47, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for working through all these changes.
0) Is there an upstream version of any of this code? Making even
cosmetic changes
would make future versions harder to merge.
No. This was the case a long time ago but for many releases
Hello Roger,
Thank you for the notes; please see the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8079075/webrev.01/
Regards,
Alexander
On 30.04.2015 16:47, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for working through all these changes.
0) Is there an upstream version of any of this
Hi Alexander,
The improvements look good to me.
Thank you, Roger
On 4/30/2015 12:35 PM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Roger,
Thank you for the notes; please see the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8079075/webrev.01/
Regards,
Alexander
On 30.04.2015 16:47, Roger
Thanks!
- Исходное сообщение -
От: roger.ri...@oracle.com
Кому: alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com
Копия: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Отправленные: Четверг, 30 Апрель 2015 г 21:41:05 GMT +03:00 Москва,
Санкт-Петербург, Волгоград
Тема: Re: RFR [9] 8079075: some docs cleanup for CORBA
