On 16/08/16 03:05, David Holmes wrote:
> hs-comp is the team forest for the compiler team. If you are working
> primarily on hotspot compiler issues and want to integrate with latest
> work the compiler team is doing, and/or you have shared compiler
> changes, then you would push to hs-comp.
>
Hi Andrew,
On 16/08/2016 3:59 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 15/08/16 18:40, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 08/15/2016 08:15 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
has anyone looked at this yet? I've just got back from my travels.
I think it was reviewed and committed, as "HG Updater" comments say:
https://bugs.
On 08/15/2016 08:59 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 15/08/16 18:40, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> On 08/15/2016 08:15 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> has anyone looked at this yet? I've just got back from my travels.
>>
>> I think it was reviewed and committed, as "HG Updater" comments say:
>> https://bugs
On 15/08/16 18:40, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 08/15/2016 08:15 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> has anyone looked at this yet? I've just got back from my travels.
>
> I think it was reviewed and committed, as "HG Updater" comments say:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162458
Hmm, okay.
On 08/15/2016 08:15 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> has anyone looked at this yet? I've just got back from my travels.
I think it was reviewed and committed, as "HG Updater" comments say:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162458
Thanks,
-Aleksey
Hi,
On 27/07/16 12:47, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> I made an embarrassing mistake in the fix for
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151163
> All Buffer implementations should leverage Unsafe unaligned accessors
>
> The offset calculation for Unsafe access was incorrect, it’s easy to
> g
Paul,
I have marked this bug (JDK-8162458) as an 'integration_blocker'
in order to keep JDK-8151163 from leaving JDK9-hs in its current
state.
Dan
On 7/28/16 4:33 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hooking in nio dev.
I think this issue is important to review/push soon (i.e. this week) so as it
does no
> On 28 Jul 2016, at 12:40, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> On 27/07/2016 12:47, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I made an embarrassing mistake in the fix for
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151163
>> All Buffer implementations should leverage Unsafe unaligned accessors
>>
>> T
On 27/07/2016 12:47, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi,
I made an embarrassing mistake in the fix for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151163
All Buffer implementations should leverage Unsafe unaligned accessors
The offset calculation for Unsafe access was incorrect, it’s easy to get
conf
Hooking in nio dev.
I think this issue is important to review/push soon (i.e. this week) so as it
does not leak out beyond the hs repo.
—
Incidentally this patch also fixes what might have been a long standing bug in
the compact method of buffer views.
Here is ByteBufferAsIntBufferB’s compact
Hi,
I made an embarrassing mistake in the fix for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151163
All Buffer implementations should leverage Unsafe unaligned accessors
The offset calculation for Unsafe access was incorrect, it’s easy to get
confused because for heap buffers the offset is r
11 matches
Mail list logo
