> On Dec 6, 2016, at 6:17 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8169653.01/
Looks good.
Mandy
On 06/12/16 14:17, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 6 Dec 2016, at 13:00, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Chris,
Looks good. I wonder about the two different links for
platform class loader now.
...
You’re right. Since getPlatformClassLoader has a link to the built-in loader
verbiage, how about we just drop
> On 6 Dec 2016, at 13:00, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Looks good. I wonder about the two different links for
> platform class loader now.
> ...
You’re right. Since getPlatformClassLoader has a link to the built-in loader
verbiage, how about we just drop the direct link? Developers
Hi Chris,
Looks good. I wonder about the two different links for
platform class loader now.
Should the first one perhaps include "nor its ancestor" in
the link text?
best regards,
-- daniel
On 06/12/16 12:25, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 6 Dec 2016, at 11:53, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Chris,
I
> On 6 Dec 2016, at 11:53, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I have an additional suggestion: could you update the
> comment of the private ObjectInputStream::latestUserDefinedLoader()
> in the same file to align with what the method is actually
> doing?
>
> I looked at what jdk.internal.m
Hi Chris,
I have an additional suggestion: could you update the
comment of the private ObjectInputStream::latestUserDefinedLoader()
in the same file to align with what the method is actually
doing?
I looked at what jdk.internal.misc.VM.latestUserDefinedLoader()
does, and the comment in ObjectInp
> On 6 Dec 2016, at 11:35, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Is that a typo? I see it at two places:
>
> otherwise,
> + * loaded is the {@linkplain ClassLoader#getPlatformClassLoader()
> * platform class loader}.
>
> ("loaded" vs "loader")
It is a typo, thanks. For completeness
Hi Chris,
Is that a typo? I see it at two places:
otherwise,
+ * loaded is the {@linkplain
ClassLoader#getPlatformClassLoader()
* platform class loader}.
("loaded" vs "loader")
best regards,
-- daniel
On 06/12/16 11:27, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Mandy and I exchanged some mails off
Mandy and I exchanged some mails off line, here is updated proposed wording.
> On 21 Nov 2016, at 09:41, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
> JDK-8155977 updated ObjectInputStream::resolveClass, and
> resolveProxyClass, to work with the platform class loader, but
> inadvertently removed the text describing
JDK-8155977 updated ObjectInputStream::resolveClass, and
resolveProxyClass, to work with the platform class loader, but
inadvertently removed the text describing the order in which the
call stack is searched, for the 'loader'.
The omission, from Java SE 8, is " ... closest such method to the
curr
10 matches
Mail list logo
