Re: [PATCH] JDK-8134373: explore potential uses of convenience factories within the JDK

Hi Jonathan, On 2016-09-13 02:13, Jonathan Bluett-Duncan wrote: Hi Patrick, Thank you very much for the offer to hold my patch for me! No problem. Is it common practice to send patches to others using PGP? No, this is my personal setting. Kind regards, Jonathan On 12 September 2016

Re: [PATCH] JDK-8134373: explore potential uses of convenience factories within the JDK

Hi Patrick, Thank you very much for the offer to hold my patch for me! Is it common practice to send patches to others using PGP? Kind regards, Jonathan On 12 September 2016 at 21:08, Patrick Reinhart wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > As just also wanted to help some more clean-up

Re: [PATCH] JDK-8134373: explore potential uses of convenience factories within the JDK

Hi Jonathan, As just also wanted to help some more clean-up in the JDKs final phase, I could offer you to hold that patch. Just send it to me and I will prepare the webrev for you…. -Patrick > Am 12.09.2016 um 20:36 schrieb Jonathan Bluett-Duncan > : > > Hi David,

Re: [PATCH] JDK-8134373: explore potential uses of convenience factories within the JDK

Hi David, Thanks for letting me know about the attachment stripping behaviour, and reminding me about the current state of the JDK 9 release schedule. Stuart, would you be happy to host my patch on cr.openjdk.java.net? If not, do you know who else might be happy to host it for me? Or

Re: [PATCH] JDK-8134373: explore potential uses of convenience factories within the JDK

Hi Jonathon, Attachments get stripped from most of the mailing lists so you will need to find someone to host these for you on cr.openjdk.java.net. That aside you may be hard pressed to find anyone who can look at this future work now, given where things are with the JDK 9 release schedule.

Re: [PATCH] JDK-8134373: explore potential uses of convenience factories within the JDK

Sorry, it seems Gmail is not cooperating with me... If anyone does need to see the patches in-body, then I'd be happy to inline them directly in a reply, but that wouldn't be ideal since there are 18 of them in total... :/ On 11 September 2016 at 00:54, Jonathan Bluett-Duncan <

Re: [PATCH] JDK-8134373: explore potential uses of convenience factories within the JDK

Oops, it didn't fully register for me that I actually needed to include attachments in the body! So here they are again, this time in the body (hopefully).