On Mar 27, 5:30pm, chris.hega...@oracle.com (Chris Hegarty) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: DefaultProxySelector socks override
| On 03/27/2013 05:22 PM, chris...@zoulas.com wrote:
| >
| > Sure, I just requested a subscription to net-dev so I might not see the
| > first few messages. T
On 03/27/2013 05:22 PM, chris...@zoulas.com wrote:
Sure, I just requested a subscription to net-dev so I might not see the
first few messages. To clarify:
1. I will add socks.proxyHost and socks.proxyPort for consistency
with the other protocols, leaving as is socksProxyH
On Mar 27, 3:54pm, chris.hega...@oracle.com (Chris Hegarty) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: DefaultProxySelector socks override
Hi Chris,
| [cc'ing net-dev, we can then probably drop core-libs-dev and continue
| the discussion over on net-dev]
|
| Christos,
|
| SOCKS is really old and not as w
[cc'ing net-dev, we can then probably drop core-libs-dev and continue
the discussion over on net-dev]
Christos,
SOCKS is really old and not as widely deployed as other proxies. That
said, I don't have any specific problem with your proposal. SOCKS is
really in maintenance mode in the JDK, but
