On 4/28/20 9:48 PM, Jason Mehrens wrote:
Looks like It is intentional that unmodifiable queues are not present. See:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-5030930. The same logic would have
been used for when Deque was added in the following release.
Good find.
Looking at the Queue i
Hello, Paul and Stuart!
Thank you for sharing your thoughts regarding my proposal. Yes, the
proposal was triggered by twitter discussion but I needed this
functionality occasionally in my daily work several times.
Sorry for mixing the goal and possible solution, so let's start again.
The goal of
of
Stuart Marks
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 6:57 PM
To: Paul Sandoz
Cc: core-libs-dev
Subject: Re: LinkedHashMap/LinkedHashSet enhancement: OrderedMap/OrderedSet
Hi Paul,
I too hesitate about adding Ordered* interfaces. As I said previously, I don't
think they're very useful, and th
Hi Paul,
I too hesitate about adding Ordered* interfaces. As I said previously, I don't
think they're very useful, and they do seem rather Queue- or Deque-like.
Indeed, Tagir was musing the other day on Twitter about a Deque view of
LinkedHashSet and possibly LinkedHashMap. I think that might
Hi Tagir,
I am hesitant to add new interfaces specific to Set/Map for a non-indexed
encounter order.
The interface OrderedSet is tantalizingly queue-like, in fact rather close to
the read-only part of Deque. Did you consider the possibility of LinkedHashSet
implementing Deque?
I have not tho
Hi Tagir,
A few quick thoughts on this.
There does seem to be a conceptual hole here. Most collections implementations
have an obvious interface that provides a reasonable abstraction of that
implementation. However, one is "missing" for LinkedHashSet, since there's no
interface more speciali
