Folks,
I ran my TimSort benchmark on JDK6u14, server and client compilers. Here
are the results:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=rn84RNB-6DNTCgzXUL9I34g&output=html
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=rMiauaBPz4mNCtDN0zXhNeg&output=html .
These results are on my Windows XP SP 3 laptop (I
Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> Hi core libraries developers,
>>
>> I met Alan Bateman last evening, and we thought that we
>> should have another OpenJDK Core Libraries Forum this week,
>> so (drumroll) it's time again on Friday, for the
>>
>> OpenJDK Forum
>>
>> Date/Time: Fr
Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Hi core libraries developers,
>
> I met Alan Bateman last evening, and we thought that we
> should have another OpenJDK Core Libraries Forum this week,
> so (drumroll) it's time again on Friday, for the
>
> OpenJDK Forum
>
> Date/Time: Friday May 29th, 8 AM Pacific,
Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> 2009/5/28 Gary Benson :
>>> Dalibor Topic wrote:
Date/Time: Friday May 29th, 8 AM Pacific, 1600 GMT, 5 PM Germany
>>> Is that 1600 GMT or 1600 BST (ie 1500 GMT)?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://gbenson.net/
>>>
>> Dalibor, it's
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/5/28 Gary Benson :
>> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>> Date/Time: Friday May 29th, 8 AM Pacific, 1600 GMT, 5 PM Germany
>> Is that 1600 GMT or 1600 BST (ie 1500 GMT)?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gary
>>
>> --
>> http://gbenson.net/
>>
>
> Dalibor, it's looks like you copied and paste
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/5/28 Gary Benson :
>> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>> Date/Time: Friday May 29th, 8 AM Pacific, 1600 GMT, 5 PM Germany
>> Is that 1600 GMT or 1600 BST (ie 1500 GMT)?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gary
>>
>> --
>> http://gbenson.net/
>>
>
> Dalibor, it's looks like you copied and paste
2009/5/28 Gary Benson :
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> Date/Time: Friday May 29th, 8 AM Pacific, 1600 GMT, 5 PM Germany
>
> Is that 1600 GMT or 1600 BST (ie 1500 GMT)?
>
> Cheers,
> Gary
>
> --
> http://gbenson.net/
>
Dalibor, it's looks like you copied and pasted the wrong line again... ;)
If it's 5p
Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Date/Time: Friday May 29th, 8 AM Pacific, 1600 GMT, 5 PM Germany
Is that 1600 GMT or 1600 BST (ie 1500 GMT)?
Cheers,
Gary
--
http://gbenson.net/
Everyone, I'm terribly sorry. I got extremely busy, buying a house and all,
and completely forgot about this, and I don't think I will have time. I
should have said so long ago.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Kevin Bourrillion wrote:
> Curious if anyone is transcribing the call into text y
Ulf Zibis wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.04.2009 13:52, Max (Weijun) Wang schrieb:
>>
>>
>> To ease your acquaintance with them, comments are added:
>>
>>> Alan Bateman: the NIO2 guy
>>> Chris Hegarty: the SCTP guy
>>> Vincent Ryan: the ECC guy
>>> Michael McMahon: the HTTP server guy
>>> Xueming (Sherman) S
On 04/14/09 13:21, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/4/14 Max (Weijun) Wang :
On Apr 14, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Kevin Bourrillion wrote:
Curious if anyone is transcribing the call into text yet? Word-for-word
not necessary, but understandable? If no one says they've already d
Am 14.04.2009 13:52, Max (Weijun) Wang schrieb:
To ease your acquaintance with them, comments are added:
Alan Bateman: the NIO2 guy
Chris Hegarty: the SCTP guy
Vincent Ryan: the ECC guy
Michael McMahon: the HTTP server guy
Xueming (Sherman) Shen: the corelib guy (sorry I forget what he said
2009/4/14 Max (Weijun) Wang :
>
> On Apr 14, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>
>> Kevin Bourrillion wrote:
>>>
>>> Curious if anyone is transcribing the call into text yet? Word-for-word
>>> not necessary, but understandable? If no one says they've already done
>>> that or at least started
On Apr 14, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Kevin Bourrillion wrote:
Curious if anyone is transcribing the call into text yet? Word-for-
word
not necessary, but understandable? If no one says they've already
done
that or at least started, I could volunteer.
That would be great, Ke
Kevin Bourrillion wrote:
> Curious if anyone is transcribing the call into text yet? Word-for-word
> not necessary, but understandable? If no one says they've already done
> that or at least started, I could volunteer.
That would be great, Kevin - the list of speakers in order of first appearanc
Kevin Bourrillion wrote:
Curious if anyone is transcribing the call into text yet?
Word-for-word not necessary, but understandable? If no one says
they've already done that or at least started, I could volunteer.
I was going to write up minutes but I haven't started yet. You are very
welcome
( CC'd the list addresses )
Hi Josh,
thanks for the e-mail addresses.
The subject, I like to discuss, is an RFE I've recently filed:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6812862 [provide
customizable hash() algorithm in HashMap for speed tuning]
The RFE was rejected from Sun engi
Oh, that would be great, because I didn't understand all. Maybe the
speakers could review it, for making details clearer, or adding some links.
-Ulf
Am 10.04.2009 20:24, Kevin Bourrillion schrieb:
Curious if anyone is transcribing the call into text yet?
Word-for-word not necessary, but unde
Curious if anyone is transcribing the call into text yet? Word-for-word not
necessary, but understandable? If no one says they've already done that or
at least started, I could volunteer.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Tom Hawtin wrote:
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>
>> Tom Hawtin wrote:
>>
>>> Da
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Tom Hawtin wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
A recording of the call is available on
http://mediacast.sun.com/users/robilad/media/openjdk6-core-libs.ogg
Any chance of getting that in a mainstream format? Windows doesn't
understand it. Rhythmbox under VirtualBox freezes.
http:/
Tom Hawtin wrote:
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>
>> A recording of the call is available on
>> http://mediacast.sun.com/users/robilad/media/openjdk6-core-libs.ogg
>
> Any chance of getting that in a mainstream format? Windows doesn't
> understand it. Rhythmbox under VirtualBox freezes.
http://mediacas
Hi all,
it was nice to me as a very external person listening your conversation.
Thanks to Dalibor, inviting me.
The project, I'm currently working in is:
https://java-nio-charset-enhanced.dev.java.net/
Can somebody send me the correct email-address of Joshua Bloch to send
him the question I
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/4/9 Jeff Dinkins :
VLC plays ogg.
What? You don't have VLC? Well time to grab a copy!
The last time I installed a video player (Channel 4's) Windows Media
Player stopped working.
p.s. I vote to keep it ogg only to promote more people to use it :-)
I think
2009/4/9 Mark Thornton :
> Jeff Dinkins wrote:
>>
>> VLC plays ogg.
>>
>> What? You don't have VLC? Well time to grab a copy!
>>
>> http://www.videolan.org/vlc
>>
>> jeff
>>
>> p.s. I vote to keep it ogg only to promote more people to use it :-)
>>
> Shouldn't you be using a format supported by Ja
2009/4/9 Jeff Dinkins :
>
> VLC plays ogg.
>
> What? You don't have VLC? Well time to grab a copy!
>
> http://www.videolan.org/vlc
>
> jeff
>
> p.s. I vote to keep it ogg only to promote more people to use it :-)
>
+1 :)
Personally, I think there was already a compromise by going with Ogg
Vorbis
Tom Hawtin wrote:
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>
>> A recording of the call is available on
>> http://mediacast.sun.com/users/robilad/media/openjdk6-core-libs.ogg
>
> Any chance of getting that in a mainstream format? Windows doesn't
> understand it. Rhythmbox under VirtualBox freezes.
I'll generate a
2009/4/9 Tom Hawtin :
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>
>> A recording of the call is available on
>> http://mediacast.sun.com/users/robilad/media/openjdk6-core-libs.ogg
>
> Any chance of getting that in a mainstream format? Windows doesn't
> understand it. Rhythmbox under VirtualBox freezes.
>
> Tom Hawti
Dalibor Topic wrote:
A recording of the call is available on
http://mediacast.sun.com/users/robilad/media/openjdk6-core-libs.ogg
Any chance of getting that in a mainstream format? Windows doesn't
understand it. Rhythmbox under VirtualBox freezes.
Tom Hawtin
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> Thanks Alan and Dalibor for organising a great conference call. I
> picked up a lot of stuff I didn't even realise was happening for JDK7,
> like Josh's work on the new sorting algorithm which I'll be really
> happy to see go in. It's just a pity we don't see more of t
2009/4/9 Dalibor Topic :
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> Hi core libraries developers,
>>
>> I'd like to carry on doing these, as the last one we did for
>> contributing into OpenJDK 6 was fun and productive, so per
>> Alan Bateman's suggestion, it's time again tomorrow, on
>> Thursday, for the
>>
>>
Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Hi core libraries developers,
>
> I'd like to carry on doing these, as the last one we did for
> contributing into OpenJDK 6 was fun and productive, so per
> Alan Bateman's suggestion, it's time again tomorrow, on
> Thursday, for the
>
> OpenJDK Forum
>
> Date/Tim
31 matches
Mail list logo
