> On 7 Dec 2015, at 16:23, Tagir F. Valeev wrote:
>
> Hello, Chris, Paul!
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
>>> Tagir,
>>>
>>> It would seem most useful to update the implementation to
>>> match the current spec.
>
> PS> Yes, it’s an oversight and lacked a test for such case.
>
> PS> Tagir, t
Hello, Chris, Paul!
Thank you for the review.
>> Tagir,
>>
>> It would seem most useful to update the implementation to
>> match the current spec.
PS> Yes, it’s an oversight and lacked a test for such case.
PS> Tagir, thanks for finding this. Would it be possible for you to
PS> also add a test
On 07/12/15 13:55, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On 7 Dec 2015, at 11:18, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Tagir,
It would seem most useful to update the implementation to
match the current spec.
Yes, it’s an oversight and lacked a test for such case.
Tagir, thanks for finding this. Would it be possible for you
> On 7 Dec 2015, at 11:18, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
> Tagir,
>
> It would seem most useful to update the implementation to
> match the current spec.
Yes, it’s an oversight and lacked a test for such case.
Tagir, thanks for finding this. Would it be possible for you to also add a test
to jdk/te
Tagir,
It would seem most useful to update the implementation to
match the current spec. To that end, your first patch looks
like the most appropriate change, pattern-patch.txt.
-Chris.
On 06/12/15 12:21, Tagir F. Valeev wrote:
Hello!
Currently Pattern.splitAsStream JavaDoc says [1]:
* If
