Henry,
Thanks for taking care of this, if the VM team is happy with it.
I am good, consider me as reviewer.
Thanks
Kumar
Well, comments about -Xcomp and -Xusealtsigs doesn’t seem to require a change,
are we good on this webrev?
Let me know if there is anything need to change, otherwise, I
Well, comments about -Xcomp and -Xusealtsigs doesn’t seem to require a change,
are we good on this webrev?
Let me know if there is anything need to change, otherwise, I would need
official +1 from reviewers. :)
Cheers,
Henry
On September 8, 2016 at 10:39:13 PM, Alan Bateman
On 08/09/2016 20:52, Henry Jen wrote:
Hi,
Please review a trivial fix for bug 8042148 at following URL:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/jdk9/8042148/webrev/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042148
The ordering/re-wording looks okay, just surprised to see -Xcomp
On 9/09/2016 1:05 PM, Henry Jen wrote:
According to David in the comments, -Xusealtsigs is no longer an option, is it?
We have deprecated a number of flags:
// -Xoss, -Xsqnopause, -Xoptimize, -Xboundthreads, -Xusealtsigs
so they are ignored. But we still allow the user to specify them - and
According to David in the comments, -Xusealtsigs is no longer an option, is it?
Cheers,
Henry
On September 8, 2016 at 3:27:21 PM, Kumar Srinivasan
(kumar.x.sriniva...@oracle.com) wrote:
> Hi Henry,
>
> Looks a lot nicer with the alpha ordering, but it seems to be missing
> -Xusealtsigs use
Hi Henry,
Looks a lot nicer with the alpha ordering, but it seems to be missing
-Xusealtsigs use alternative signals instead of SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 for
JVM internal signals
Kumar
On 9/8/2016 12:52 PM, Henry Jen wrote:
Hi,
Please review a trivial fix for bug 8042148 at following URL:
