On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:18:20 GMT, Rafael Winterhalter
wrote:
>> This patch assures that an annotation on a type bound is placed on the
>> correct bound index.
>
> Rafael Winterhalter has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and
> previous commits have been removed. The
> incremental
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:31:58 GMT, Joel Borggrén-Franck
wrote:
>> Pre-git review thread here:
>> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-June/067049.html
>
> @raphw test is missing imports and doesn't compile, other than that looks
> good.
Bad copy paste. Fixed on the
> This patch assures that an annotation on a type bound is placed on the
> correct bound index.
Rafael Winterhalter has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and
previous commits have been removed. The
incremental views will show differences compared to the previous content of the
PR.
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:10:00 GMT, Joel Borggrén-Franck
wrote:
>> This patch assures that an annotation on a type bound is placed on the
>> correct bound index.
>
> Pre-git review thread here:
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-June/067049.html
@raphw test is missing
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 19:49:08 GMT, Rafael Winterhalter
wrote:
> This patch assures that an annotation on a type bound is placed on the
> correct bound index.
Pre-git review thread here:
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-June/067049.html
-
PR:
