On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 13:20:44 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This reinserts setting common pool parallelism inadvertently clobbered in
>> JDK-8259800
>
> This looks okay to me, I just wonder if we should have a test to the value of
> getCommonPoolParallelism.
We once had a test, but now that Runtim
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 10:52:45 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
> This reinserts setting common pool parallelism inadvertently clobbered in
> JDK-8259800
This looks okay to me, I just wonder if we should have a test to the value of
getCommonPoolParallelism.
-
Marked as reviewed by alanb (Review
