On 15.02.2014 0:13, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
Looks fine. assume the will be addressed as part of a full sweep
of javax/naming
On Feb 14, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Thanks!
Yes, I didn't touch formatting, only typos.
Hello!
May I please have a review of the fix?
It's no
On 14/02/2014 19:48, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hello!
May I please have a review of the fix?
It's not meant to be a proof reading, I only fixed some obvious typos.
Some of them were reported at the time of java 1.4, so it is probably
the time to have them fixed.
BUG: https://bugs.openjdk.java.ne
Looks fine. assume the will be addressed as part of a full sweep
of javax/naming
On Feb 14, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> May I please have a review of the fix?
>
> It's not meant to be a proof reading, I only fixed some obvious typos.
> Some of them were reported at th
