An update, I played around with the declarations a bit more, but wasn't
about to find something workable so I pushed the already-reviewed version.
If someone else wants to take a crack at improving the generics, I think
that would be a fine refactoring.
Thanks,
-Joe
On 7/25/2013 2:16 PM, Jo
On 07/25/2013 01:58 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 25/07/2013 13:33, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hello,
Please review these changes to remove the javac lint warnings from
the java.lang.ref package:
8021429 Fix lint warnings in java.lang.ref
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8021429.0/
Care was tak
On 25/07/2013 13:33, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hello,
Please review these changes to remove the javac lint warnings from the
java.lang.ref package:
8021429 Fix lint warnings in java.lang.ref
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8021429.0/
Care was taken to not change any signatures of public API
These look fine to me.
Mike
On Jul 25 2013, at 13:33 , Joe Darcy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please review these changes to remove the javac lint warnings from the
> java.lang.ref package:
>
>8021429 Fix lint warnings in java.lang.ref
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8021429.0/
>
> Care wa
Looks fine joe
On Jul 25, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please review these changes to remove the javac lint warnings from the
> java.lang.ref package:
>
>8021429 Fix lint warnings in java.lang.ref
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8021429.0/
>
> Care was taken to no
