On 05/11/2013 03:20, Mandy Chung wrote:
David,
Rereading your comment and I think you misread the switch statement (see
my comments below). In any case, I revisited ThreadStateController.java
and looked int the potential races and have done further cleanup. Here
is the updated webrev.
On 11/4/2013 8:42 PM, David Holmes wrote:
This looks good to me. One nit that caused me some confusion - it took
me a while to realize that in transitionTo eg:
221 public void transitionTo(Thread.State tstate) throws
InterruptedException {
222 switch (tstate) {
223
Thanks Mandy.
One minor nit:
Having goSleep be an instance method on ThreadStateController makes the
usage look weird:
thread.goSleep(10); // actually makes current thread go sleep
I suggest making it static and use static import to shorten the call site :)
If you do change that, no need
On 11/5/2013 5:07 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Thanks Mandy.
One minor nit:
Having goSleep be an instance method on ThreadStateController makes
the usage look weird:
thread.goSleep(10); // actually makes current thread go sleep
Good catch. I changed it to a static pause(long ms) method.
David,
Rereading your comment and I think you misread the switch statement (see
my comments below). In any case, I revisited ThreadStateController.java
and looked int the potential races and have done further cleanup. Here
is the updated webrev.
Hi Mandy,
On 5/11/2013 1:20 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
David,
Rereading your comment and I think you misread the switch statement (see
Yes I did - many times - sorry.
my comments below). In any case, I revisited ThreadStateController.java
and looked int the potential races and have done
On 10/31/2013 11:01 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
+iterations++;
Using ++ on a volatile int looks racy. Using an AtomicInteger is
strictly more reliable.
Oh that's right. Will fix that. I don't really like duplicating the
code in these 2 tests and I am going to refactor
Updated webrev that has a new
test/lib/testlibrary/ThreadStateController.java and also change to use
AtomicInteger:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk8/webrevs/8022208/webrev.01/
Mandy
On 10/31/2013 11:22 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 10/31/2013 11:01 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
+
On 31/10/2013 19:11, Mandy Chung wrote:
Updated webrev that has a new
test/lib/testlibrary/ThreadStateController.java and also change to use
AtomicInteger:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk8/webrevs/8022208/webrev.01/
Mandy
Is ThreadStateController general enough for the unname package
On 10/31/2013 12:34 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 31/10/2013 19:11, Mandy Chung wrote:
Updated webrev that has a new
test/lib/testlibrary/ThreadStateController.java and also change to
use AtomicInteger:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk8/webrevs/8022208/webrev.01/
Mandy
Is
Hi Mandy,
On 1/11/2013 5:11 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Updated webrev that has a new
test/lib/testlibrary/ThreadStateController.java and also change to use
AtomicInteger:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk8/webrevs/8022208/webrev.01/
Sorry but I don't see how this works - and that applies to
On 10/31/2013 5:38 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Mandy,
On 1/11/2013 5:11 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Updated webrev that has a new
test/lib/testlibrary/ThreadStateController.java and also change to use
AtomicInteger:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk8/webrevs/8022208/webrev.01/
Sorry but I
12 matches
Mail list logo
