Deven,
This was pushed a while ago you should have seen the putback on the alias
See http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/7a8978a5bb6e
Best
Lance
On Jan 10, 2013, at 12:49 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi Lance,
Is there any update for this issue. If you have anything I can do, please let
The JCK and RowSet TCK will have base tests to validate. I have a separate set
of unit tests for JDBC which includes more detailed tests than what you had
suggested as well as end to end tests.
Best
Lance
On Jan 10, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi Lance,
I am glad to see the patch
Hi Lance,
Is there any update for this issue. If you have anything I can do,
please let me know.
Thanks a lot!
On 11/24/2012 12:45 AM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
It is on my list. to update the javadocs I need a ccc which I have
not done yet and is needed as part of this change
On Nov
Hi Lance,
Is there any plan for this issue, if any could you update to me?
Thanks a lot!
On 10/29/2012 06:39 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
Hi Deven,
I will address the needed updates a bit later.
Thank you for your input
Best
Lance
On Oct 29, 2012, at 3:51 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi
It is on my list. to update the javadocs I need a ccc which I have not done
yet and is needed as part of this change
On Nov 23, 2012, at 3:07 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi Lance,
Is there any plan for this issue, if any could you update to me?
Thanks a lot!
On 10/29/2012 06:39 PM, Lance
Hi Alan,
The Java Spec does not mention the thread safe for JDBC API. But I see
the other code in SerialBlob/SerialClob have not consider it.
I think use buff == null to replace isFree is a good idea because it
also avoid the problem for the condition buf == null isFree == false
so we
Hi Deven,
I will address the needed updates a bit later.
Thank you for your input
Best
Lance
On Oct 29, 2012, at 3:51 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi Alan,
The Java Spec does not mention the thread safe for JDBC API. But I see the
other code in SerialBlob/SerialClob have not consider it.
I
On 21/09/2012 04:21, Deven You wrote:
Hi Lance,
I am very busy with other work so I can't work with the
SerialBlob/SerialClob item for long time. I am very happy to refine
the current test case and create new tests for SerialClob.
I have create a new webre[1] for this task, please review
Hi Lance,
I am very busy with other work so I can't work with the
SerialBlob/SerialClob item for long time. I am very happy to refine the
current test case and create new tests for SerialClob.
I have create a new webre[1] for this task, please review it.
[1]
Hi Lance,
Did you review the patch and compare it to yours. I just have some more
words for the patch.
1. I think the current spec for free() is not clear, how about add below
comments:
After free has been called, any attempt to invoke a method other
than free will result in a
Hi Deven,
We had a holiday here on Weds, so I am still catching up.
First, thank you for taking the time to propose a patch.
Here are a few comments based on the changes I have made in my workspace and
comparing to your proposed changes
- The same issue applies to SerialClob
- instead of
Hi All,
Could anyone notice this problem?
Thanks a lot!
On 06/25/2012 04:18 PM, Deven You wrote:
Hi All,
First of all, if the jdbc problem has a better mailing list to post
please tell me.
I find that javax.sql.rowset.serial.SerialBlob is not fully
implemented in OpenJDK 8. Methods
Hi Deven,
Thanks for the email and the proposed patch. I will look at this later today
or tomorrow. I actually have made these changes in my workspace for JDK 8 but
will compare your changes to mine.
Best
Lance
On Jul 2, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi All,
Could anyone notice this
13 matches
Mail list logo
