Everything looks resolved to me as well. I will push this webrev over the
weekend or on Monday. Thank you for your patience in working through the
pedantic details. Hopefully this will make the process smoother for all future
commits and we won't have to revisit any of these issues.
Mike
On Fe
Neil Richards wrote:
Hi Alan, Mike,
Please find attached a further webrev zip file with the IBM copyright
split out into its own little comment block, as requested.
Good to see this finally resolved. Thumbs up from me. Mike has offered
to push this so I'll leave it to him. Also I assume this
Neil Richards wrote:
Hi Alan, Mike,
Please find attached one more webrev zip, with updated license text
and now based off jdk7-b128.
Let me know if this is now good to be committed, or if there's
anything else I need to do,
Thanks,
Neil
Thanks for perceiving with this. The only thing that loo
Neil Richards wrote:
:
Okay. I've updated the changeset to do this too, and attached this as
a webrev zip file (as per Dalibor's suggestion).
Please review this modified changeset, and let me know if anything
further is required for its acceptance.
Looks fine to me. As per the tests for the
On 1/5/11 5:36 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I've taken the liberty to generate a webrev from the changeset, just to make it
a bit easier for folks to browse and review.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/6927486/webrev/
I don't see any issues with the changes to j.u.Hashtable. You might have seen
Stua
Neil Richards wrote:
Please find attached a changeset to address the problem reported in
bug 6927486, "Deadlock in legacy Hashtable writeObject()".
I've taken the liberty to generate a webrev from the changeset, just to
make it a bit easier for folks to browse and review.
http://cr.openjdk.
On 12/22/10 12:19 PM, Neil Richards wrote:
> On 22 December 2010 09:38, David Holmes wrote:
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> Any chance you can generate webrevs as mentioned in:
>>
>> http://openjdk.java.net/guide/changePlanning.html
>
> Hi David,
>>From the documentation, I don't believe I can do so yet.
>
H
On 22 December 2010 09:38, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> Any chance you can generate webrevs as mentioned in:
>
> http://openjdk.java.net/guide/changePlanning.html
Hi David,
>From the documentation, I don't believe I can do so yet.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/ (referred to from the page you
Please find attached a changeset to address the problem reported in
bug 6927486, "Deadlock in legacy Hashtable writeObject()".
The problem reported is similar to one found in java.util.Vector, for
which a fix is also currently under review
(http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2010
