Re: RFR 8132964 Spliterator documentation on Priority(Blocking)Queue

2016-11-21 Thread Chris Hegarty
> On 21 Nov 2016, at 20:57, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > Looks good to me! +1 -Chris. > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Paul Sandoz > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please review specification clarifications to PriorityQueue and >> PriorityBlockingQueue for the spliterator. Ordinarily i would not s

Re: RFR 8132964 Spliterator documentation on Priority(Blocking)Queue

2016-11-21 Thread Doug Lea
On 11/21/2016 03:52 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: Hi, Please review specification clarifications to PriorityQueue and PriorityBlockingQueue for the spliterator. Ordinarily i would not specify what spliterator characteristics are not reported, but in this case given what is said about iterator I thin

Re: RFR 8132964 Spliterator documentation on Priority(Blocking)Queue

2016-11-21 Thread Martin Buchholz
Looks good to me! On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: > Hi, > > Please review specification clarifications to PriorityQueue and > PriorityBlockingQueue for the spliterator. Ordinarily i would not specify > what spliterator characteristics are not reported, but in this case given

RFR 8132964 Spliterator documentation on Priority(Blocking)Queue

2016-11-21 Thread Paul Sandoz
Hi, Please review specification clarifications to PriorityQueue and PriorityBlockingQueue for the spliterator. Ordinarily i would not specify what spliterator characteristics are not reported, but in this case given what is said about iterator I think it reasonable to say it about spliterator (

Re: Spliterator documentation on Priority(Blocking)Queue

2015-08-04 Thread Paul Sandoz
On 4 Aug 2015, at 13:42, Tagir Valeev wrote: > Hello! > > You can do it here: > > http://bugreport.java.com/ > > (Write access to the Java Bug System requires OpenJDK author status.) > > Thank you for the clarification. I filed the issue with Review ID: JI-9023040. > Thanks, and here it

Re: Spliterator documentation on Priority(Blocking)Queue

2015-08-04 Thread Tagir Valeev
Hello! You can do it here: > > http://bugreport.java.com/ > > (Write access to the Java Bug System requires OpenJDK author status.) > Thank you for the clarification. I filed the issue with Review ID: JI-9023040. > It’s probably because people are busy. If you have it can you forward me > (pe

Re: Spliterator documentation on Priority(Blocking)Queue

2015-08-04 Thread Paul Sandoz
On 4 Aug 2015, at 11:18, Tagir Valeev wrote: > Hello, Paul. > > I think I have no access rights to do it. You can do it here: http://bugreport.java.com/ (Write access to the Java Bug System requires OpenJDK author status.) > Should I have to sign an OCA for this? No. > I submitted the

Re: Spliterator documentation on Priority(Blocking)Queue

2015-08-04 Thread Tagir Valeev
Hello, Paul. I think I have no access rights to do it. Should I have to sign an OCA for this? I submitted the signed OCA to oracle-ca...@oracle.com last week (as you suggested in ConstantSpliterator discussion), but still got no response. Probably I did something wrong. With best regards, Tagir V

Re: Spliterator documentation on Priority(Blocking)Queue

2015-08-04 Thread Paul Sandoz
Hi Tagir, Can you log an issue? Thanks, Paul. On 4 Aug 2015, at 06:47, Tagir Valeev wrote: > Hello! > > The PriorityQueue class iterator() returns elements in no particular order. > This is explicitly stated in JavaDoc for iterator() method [1] as well as > in class description [2]. However i

Spliterator documentation on Priority(Blocking)Queue

2015-08-03 Thread Tagir Valeev
Hello! The PriorityQueue class iterator() returns elements in no particular order. This is explicitly stated in JavaDoc for iterator() method [1] as well as in class description [2]. However it's not mentioned mentioned that spliterator() method also traverses the queue in no particular order. Wel