2 at 10:25 PM, Christos Zoulas >wrote:
>
> > On Oct 8, 11:07pm, [email protected] (David Holmes) wrote:
> > -- Subject: Re: StackTraceElement question
> >
> > | > There is also the problem of having a class hierarchy like:
> > | >
> > | > c
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Oct 8, 11:07pm, [email protected] (David Holmes) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: StackTraceElement question
>
> | > There is also the problem of having a class hierarchy like:
> | >
> | > class A extends cl
the class should not be serialized.
cheers,
Rémi
On 10/08/2012 03:07 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 8/10/2012 9:48 PM, [email protected] wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:33pm, [email protected] (Krystal Mok) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: StackTraceElement question
|> Can't you just do Class.forName
On Oct 8, 11:07pm, [email protected] (David Holmes) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: StackTraceElement question
| > There is also the problem of having a class hierarchy like:
| >
| > class A extends class I
| > class B extends class I
| >
| > and then trying to figure out if it
On 8/10/2012 11:07 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 8/10/2012 9:48 PM, [email protected] wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:33pm, [email protected] (Krystal Mok) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: StackTraceElement question
|> Can't you just do Class.forName(getClassName()) and then find the
|> encl
On 8/10/2012 9:48 PM, [email protected] wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:33pm, [email protected] (Krystal Mok) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: StackTraceElement question
|> Can't you just do Class.forName(getClassName()) and then find the
|> enclosing class?
|>
|> There could be poten
On Oct 8, 7:33pm, [email protected] (Krystal Mok) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: StackTraceElement question
| > Can't you just do Class.forName(getClassName()) and then find the
| > enclosing class?
| >
| > There could be potential class loader issues to
| use Class.forName(getCla
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:27 AM, David Holmes wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Christos Zoulas
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't know if this belongs to this list, but if it does not,
>>> please point me to where it does. I think that it would be nice if
>>> StackTraceElement which curr
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if this belongs to this list, but if it does not,
please point me to where it does. I think that it would be nice if
StackTraceElement which currently contains:
boolean equals(Object obj)
String getClas
On 06/10/2012 15:58, Krystal Mok wrote:
:
Is there any reason to store the name instead of the Class? Is it
possible to fix this in a future version of the jdk?
thanks
christos
I think this would require a bit of analysis as to the issues that might
turn up. For example, would it allow access
Hi,
I believe this discussion belongs to core-libs-dev list better. cc'd.
- Kris
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if this belongs to this list, but if it does not,
> please point me to where it does. I think that it would be nice if
> StackTraceElem
11 matches
Mail list logo
