Hi Doug,
On 06/19/2014 02:02 PM, Doug Lea wrote:
On 06/19/2014 04:48 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Or, even better, why not just using the next value from the "seeder"
sequence
for the initial value of "secondary" seed and avoid interaction with
TLR's main
seed/probe:
Thanks! Or better, just use
On 06/19/2014 04:48 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Or, even better, why not just using the next value from the "seeder" sequence
for the initial value of "secondary" seed and avoid interaction with TLR's main
seed/probe:
Thanks! Or better, just use mix32:
+if ((r = (int)mix64(seeder.get
Or, even better, why not just using the next value from the "seeder"
sequence for the initial value of "secondary" seed and avoid interaction
with TLR's main seed/probe:
diff -r 5b45a5efe417
src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ThreadLocalRandom.java
--- a/src/share/classes/java/util/concur
Hi,
I noticed an inconsistency in calling TLR.localInit() method. Everywhere
it's called conditionaly if thread-local "probe" is zero except in
TLR.nextSecondarySeed() where it's called if "secondary" seed is zero.
This re-initializes the "probe" and "seed" even though they might have
already
