On 11/12/11 15:21, Rémi Forax wrote:
On 12/10/2011 12:38 PM, maurizio cimadamore wrote:
On 09-Dec-11 10:56 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Is there a reason why the diamond syntax can't be used
with an array ?
List[] list = new List<>[12];
Because the current inference rules would end up inferring:
L
On 12/10/2011 12:38 PM, maurizio cimadamore wrote:
On 09-Dec-11 10:56 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Is there a reason why the diamond syntax can't be used
with an array ?
List[] list = new List<>[12];
Because the current inference rules would end up inferring:
List[] list = new List[12];
If you spe
On 12/11/2011 12:16 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 10/12/2011 8:56 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Is there a reason why the diamond syntax can't be used
with an array ?
List[] list = new List<>[12];
It can in Java 7. That's the bug that we just discussed in regard to
the java.util.concurrent code cleanup
On 10/12/2011 8:56 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Is there a reason why the diamond syntax can't be used
with an array ?
List[] list = new List<>[12];
It can in Java 7. That's the bug that we just discussed in regard to the
java.util.concurrent code cleanup where I suggested to use:
HashEntry[] new
On 09-Dec-11 10:56 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Is there a reason why the diamond syntax can't be used
with an array ?
List[] list = new List<>[12];
Because the current inference rules would end up inferring:
List[] list = new List[12];
If you special-cased diamond on arrays so that it is inferred
Is there a reason why the diamond syntax can't be used
with an array ?
List[] list = new List<>[12];
Rémi
