On 10/31/2011 5:11 PM, Mike Skells wrote:
(2) Iti is true that this is not a performance gain by code
improvement, but it is a performnce gain by specification.
The same arguement applies to allowing a Zip Compression of 1 rather
than the default. As for the spec, all I have seen is that it
On 10/31/2011 5:11 PM, Mike Skells wrote:
Hi Sherman,
(1) Are the number here with writing the LOC in the background
thread, in not I don't understand the comment
The writeLOC in the base code version is very slow. each int written
is written as 4 seperate bytes, each of which takes out lock
o: Mike Skells
>Cc: "core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net"
>Sent: Monday, 31 October 2011, 21:23
>Subject: Re: performance updates to jar and zip
>
>
>
>Hi Mike,
>
>(1) While it's not a "significant benefit" :-) obviously it helps
the through put to
ink that any of the API would return ../
Is it only on Z3 that this error occurs?
I will install a Java8 with the patch, but it will be at the start of
next week
regards
Mike
------------------------
*From:* Xueming Shen
*To:* core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
*Sent:* Thursday, 27 October 2011, 0:19
be at the start of next week
regards
Mike
>
>From: Xueming Shen
>To: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
>Sent: Thursday, 27 October 2011, 0:19
>Subject: Re: performance updates to jar and zip
>
>Hi Mark
>
>It appears the patch you provided
On 10/27/2011 06:07 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 27/10/2011 00:19, Xueming Shen wrote:
:
Here are the "surprising" results.
"nio" is the walkFileTree,
"io" is the File.list()
"io2" is the File.listFiles().
The nio's File.walkFileTree is 15 times faster than the "traditional"
recursion+File.
On 27/10/2011 00:19, Xueming Shen wrote:
:
Here are the "surprising" results.
"nio" is the walkFileTree,
"io" is the File.list()
"io2" is the File.listFiles().
The nio's File.walkFileTree is 15 times faster than the "traditional"
recursion+File.list().
wow!
At least for your testing on L
Hi Mark
It appears the patch you provided throws unexpected exception (attached
at the end of my
email) when I tried it out on the latest JDK8 repository. Since I
only did a quick scan of your
patch, I'm not sure what went wrong here.
This patch includes lots of stuff that obviously you ar
>Subject: Re: performance updates to jar and zip
>
>Hi Mike,
>
>It appears the patch failed to patch the ZipCoder for my JDK8 workspace (I did
>not look into
>details, guess the patch is against and "old" version, if you can just send me
>the updated
>ZipCoder f
Hi Mike,
It appears the patch failed to patch the ZipCoder for my JDK8 workspace
(I did not look into
details, guess the patch is against and "old" version, if you can just
send me the updated
ZipCoder file, I can add it into the workspace directly) I pull the
rest change into a webrev
at
h
Hi All,
I have some performance updates for the jar tool and for the Zip/Jar writing
components, including some code to allow parallel writing of Jar and ZIP files
(in java.util)
This work is not finished as yet but I am looking to see if anyone has any
views as to the shape this should move i
11 matches
Mail list logo