Re: java.util.zip throws- oversubscribed dynamic bit lengths tree

2008-06-30 Thread Harsha Godugu
Joseph D. Darcy wrote: Any idea who can help me with this exception.. If there isn't anything sensitive in your inquiry, you could send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Joe. Could anybody help me why we get into the following issue on/off. This (exception) happens when we try to read a

Re: Peculiar fruits in the JDK

2008-06-30 Thread Ulf Zibis
Hi Sherman, I had a closer look to your code. Thanks for your hints. Looks interesting. Also I see some chances for optimization, but more exactly ...later. Can you tell me something about memory consuming in the current Sun JVM? How much bytes do byte arrays consume per byte? ... or in other wo

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6 new changesets

2008-06-30 Thread bradford . wetmore
Changeset: 2f21c9f8136a Author:mullan Date: 2008-06-17 10:34 -0400 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/2f21c9f8136a 6673277: Thread unsafe lazy initialization code in sun.security.provider.certpath.*Checker classes Summary: make supportedExts variable non-static Reviewe

Re: java.util.zip throws- oversubscribed dynamic bit lengths tree

2008-06-30 Thread Dave Bristor
Hi Harsha, Do you have a reproducible testcase? This appeared years before my time, see 413, "java.util.zip.ZipException: oversubscribed dynamic bit lengths tree", and was closed with the note "Irreproducible - probably fixed some time ago." Sahoo has filed 6713913, "Fatal errors during

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 2 new changesets

2008-06-30 Thread xueming . shen
Changeset: bc9a0bba6e72 Author:sherman Date: 2008-06-30 14:06 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/bc9a0bba6e72 6675856: Open charset tests Summary: Moved non-confidiential test cased from closed repo to open repo Reviewed-by: martin + test/sun/nio/cs/BufferUnderfl

Re: java.util.zip throws- oversubscribed dynamic bit lengths tree

2008-06-30 Thread Dave Bristor
Harsha Godugu wrote: Dave Bristor wrote: Hi Harsha, Hi Dave, Unfortunately there is no stand alone reproducible test case. It appears that 6713913 and the issue I brought up here are related. Out of curiosity, I was looking into inflater / deflater code to see what it means to get the '