On 12/03/2011 03:33 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/12/2011 12:37, Rémi Forax wrote:
I've started to remove warnings from java.util
and I'm not able to cleanly retrofit java.util.PropertyPermission
because java.util.Collections.enumeration is wrongly typed.
Rémi - you might want to sync up with M
On Dec 3 2011, at 07:12 , Rémi Forax wrote:
> On 12/03/2011 03:33 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 03/12/2011 12:37, Rémi Forax wrote:
>>> I've started to remove warnings from java.util
>>> and I'm not able to cleanly retrofit java.util.PropertyPermission
>>> because java.util.Collections.enumeratio
On 12/03/2011 05:21 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
On Dec 3 2011, at 07:12 , Rémi Forax wrote:
On 12/03/2011 03:33 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/12/2011 12:37, Rémi Forax wrote:
I've started to remove warnings from java.util
and I'm not able to cleanly retrofit java.util.PropertyPermission
because ja
[bcc to jdk8-dev; subsequent reviews/comments should go to core-libs-dev]
Hi Mike, all,
I've collected all the patches together, filed bug 7117249 to cover them, and
have started this new review thread on core-libs-dev for it. I've also posted a
webrev for the collected patches:
http://cr.op
On 03/12/2011 20:59, Stuart Marks wrote:
[bcc to jdk8-dev; subsequent reviews/comments should go to core-libs-dev]
Hi Mike, all,
I've collected all the patches together, filed bug 7117249 to cover
them, and have started this new review thread on core-libs-dev for it.
I've also posted a webrev
On 02/12/2011 21:53, Stuart Marks wrote:
Actually the original code is a little odd, as it returns an instance
of an anonymous subclass of AttributedCharacterIterator.Attribute,
instead of an instance of AttributedCharacterIterator.Attribute
itself. I don't if this is right or wrong. s'marks
A
On 12/3/11 2:32 PM, Michael Barker wrote:
Mike, if you end up needing to update this patch further, it might be
easiest if you just sent all the changes in a single patch file, i.e. the
output of 'hg diff'. I can then apply it to the tip and generate a webrev
quite easily.
No problem. I'll dro
The caching ClassValue is still under review. I took the opportunity to remove
-Xlint warnings (adding type parameters) and refactor for better readability.
Also, Mike Duigou pointed out that there was still a dependency on
ClassValue.equals == Object.equals, which could create a side-channel b
