Re: Review request 8002212 - adding read/writeObject to additional SerialXXX classes -- Updated

2012-11-03 Thread Lance Andersen - Oracle
I revised the webrev, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lancea/8002212/webrev.01, taking into account the vast majority of Remi's suggestions. I also added SerialStruct to the webrev. Have a great weekend. Best Lance On Nov 2, 2012, at 7:42 PM, Remi Forax wrote: > On 11/02/2012 11:57 PM, Lance Ander

Re: Review request 8002212 - adding read/writeObject to additional SerialXXX classes

2012-11-03 Thread Remi Forax
On 11/03/2012 01:46 AM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote: Hi Remi, [...] In SerialDataLink, do you really need readObject/writeObject given that you call the default implementations. I thought about that but had decided to add them for consistency The serialization implementation needs to cre

Re: Review request 8002212 - adding read/writeObject to additional SerialXXX classes

2012-11-03 Thread Lance Andersen - Oracle
On Nov 3, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Remi Forax wrote: > On 11/03/2012 01:46 AM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote: >> Hi Remi, >> > [...] > >>> In SerialDataLink, do you really need readObject/writeObject given >>> that you call the default implementations. >> I thought about that but had decided to add t

Re: Review request 8002212 - adding read/writeObject to additional SerialXXX classes -- Updated

2012-11-03 Thread Remi Forax
On 11/03/2012 03:11 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote: I revised the webrev, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lancea/8002212/webrev.01, taking into account the vast majority of Remi's suggestions. in SerialJavaObject, hasStaticFields doesn't work, the original code doesn't work because it only che

Re: Review request 8002212 - adding read/writeObject to additional SerialXXX classes -- Updated

2012-11-03 Thread Lance Andersen - Oracle
On Nov 3, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Remi Forax wrote: > On 11/03/2012 03:11 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote: >> I revised the webrev, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lancea/8002212/webrev.01, >> taking into account the vast majority of Remi's suggestions. > > in SerialJavaObject, hasStaticFields doesn't

Re: Review request 8002212 - adding read/writeObject to additional SerialXXX classes -- Updated

2012-11-03 Thread Remi Forax
On 11/03/2012 05:23 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote: On Nov 3, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Remi Forax wrote: On 11/03/2012 03:11 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote: I revised the webrev, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lancea/8002212/webrev.01, taking into account the vast majority of Remi's suggestions.

Re: Review/comment needed for the new public java.util.Base64 class

2012-11-03 Thread Ulf Zibis
Am 30.10.2012 23:40, schrieb Xueming Shen: I'm "confused" about the order of xxcode() and Xxcoder. In other places e.g. charsets, we have de... before en..., which is also true alphabetical should not be an issue. javadoc output should be in alphabetic order. If it is really concerns you, I c

hg: jdk8/tl/langtools: 8002146: javadoc doesn't release resources in a timely manner

2012-11-03 Thread jonathan . gibbons
Changeset: ef3ad754f5c7 Author:jjg Date: 2012-11-03 21:07 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/ef3ad754f5c7 8002146: javadoc doesn't release resources in a timely manner Reviewed-by: darcy ! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javadoc/JavadocMemberEnter.java ! sr

hg: jdk8/tl/langtools: 8002168: Cleanup initialization of javadoc Messager

2012-11-03 Thread jonathan . gibbons
Changeset: 352d130c47c5 Author:jjg Date: 2012-11-03 21:09 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/352d130c47c5 8002168: Cleanup initialization of javadoc Messager Reviewed-by: darcy ! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javadoc/Start.java ! test/tools/javadoc/695883