Looks good to me now.
/Erik
On 2012-11-02 22:00, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Hi David, Kelly, Erik,
as Kelly stated the jdk only build, uses the compiler from the
import JDK, this works with -source 8 -target, which was prepped
by Joe earlier. I also checked with a jdk only jprt build submission,
On 04/11/2012 20:27, Peter Levart wrote:
:
I digress. Javadocs say: "The redefinition may change method bodies,
the constant pool and attributes. The redefinition must not add,
remove or rename fields or methods, change the signatures of methods,
or change inheritance. These restrictions maybe
On 04/11/2012 12:25, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
.
class IoTrace {
public static final boolean ENABLED =
System.getProperty("java.io.trace");
}
...which will demote the flexibility of setListener(), but have much
lower runtime overhead. This should be confirmed by microbenchmarking
Hi David.
What about my proposal for a simple double-checked-locking for the
redefinitions fields and the use of local variables for "annotations" in
getAnnotations()
and
initAnnotationsIfNecessary()
?
Are additional local Variables similar "bad habit" for memory usage (although
they only affect
I have encountered a problem with initializing the new HashMap code introduced
in Java 7u6. I'm running with 7u9. The problem only shows up running rmid
(sun.rmi.server.Activation). It seems that the AccessController needs to call
HashMap but the new code in HashMap calls AccessController whe
Hello Thomas;
I am sorry to hear that you ran in to this problem. The class initialization
order was something we found to be surprisingly brittle and tricky with this
particular change. You've run across a path we didn't anticipate. I have
created a bug for this issue : JDK-8002283 (It should
Mike,
Thanks for responding so promptly. I certainly did not expect my fix to be the
best one; I was just happy to find something that worked. I couldn't think of
a solution that didn't involve doPrivileged and HashMap knowing a lot about
each other, like adding a HashMap option just for doPr
Changeset: 519f4c9ebf8d
Author:vinnie
Date: 2012-11-05 20:18 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/519f4c9ebf8d
6383200: PBE: need new algorithm support in password based encryption
Reviewed-by: valeriep
! src/share/classes/com/sun/crypto/provider/PBEKeyFactory.java
Changeset: 9bce0c73583d
Author:ksrini
Date: 2012-10-31 10:21 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/9bce0c73583d
8001112: Make -target 8 in javac generate version 52.0 classfile
Reviewed-by: darcy, jjg
! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/jvm/Target.java
! t
Hi Alex,
On 5/11/2012 11:36 PM, Alexander Knöller wrote:
Hi David.
What about my proposal for a simple double-checked-locking for the redefinitions fields
and the use of local variables for "annotations" in
getAnnotations() and initAnnotationsIfNecessary() ?
Sorry I thought Peter's proposed
Changeset: cb65e3315b27
Author:jiangli
Date: 2012-11-05 12:51 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/cb65e3315b27
7197210: java/lang/invoke/CallSiteTest.java failing on armsflt.
Summary: Reduce work load and set longer timeout for java/lang/invoke tests.
Reviewed-by:
Hi all,
I have prepared a better patch. It addresses the goals of JEP-149 more
seriously. I also have some benchmarks. Stay tuned...
Regards, Peter
On Nov 6, 2012 2:29 AM, "David Holmes" wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 5/11/2012 11:36 PM, Alexander Knöller wrote:
>
>> Hi David.
>>
>> What about my pro
12 matches
Mail list logo
