Re: RFR: CR#8004561 : Additional Functional Interfaces and Updates

2012-12-24 Thread Remi Forax
On 12/23/2012 07:36 PM, Brian Goetz wrote: Yes, this is a deliberate u-turn that comes as a result of the unexpected interactions with the overloading resolution rules. maybe it's because the overloading resolution rules are not the right ones ? I've no idea if it's better or not, I'm just thin

Re: RFR: JDK-8005263: Logging APIs takes Supplier for message

2012-12-24 Thread Remi Forax
On 12/23/2012 07:45 PM, Brian Goetz wrote: Henry - just a quick comment on the class description. I think it would be better not to include the sentence "Since 1.8 ..." as it that will quickly become a historical note. It would be much better (in my view) to just highlight the methods with someth

Re: RFR: CR#8004561 : Additional Functional Interfaces and Updates

2012-12-24 Thread Peter Levart
On 12/24/2012 04:55 PM, Remi Forax wrote: On 12/23/2012 07:36 PM, Brian Goetz wrote: Yes, this is a deliberate u-turn that comes as a result of the unexpected interactions with the overloading resolution rules. maybe it's because the overloading resolution rules are not the right ones ? I've