On 31/12/2014 02:15, joe darcy wrote:
Hi Brian,
The new changes generally look good. A few comments, for the new code
like
291 } else if ((off < 0) || (off > val.length) || (len < 0) ||
292((off + len) > val.length) || ((off + len) <
0)) {
293 thro
Hi,
this is a proposal to resolve concerns that PrintWriter/BufferedWriter
behave
inconsistently with j.u.Formatter when setting the line.separator
property to override
system-appropriate line breaks.
Instead of providing a set of new constructors, I propose to simply
add a new default
met
Hi Folks,
We are facing issue with process builder on JRockit JVM with solaris
5.10 machine. That is realted to following bug:
http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=5049299
Currently we are using JRockit JDK 1.6.0_37-R28.2.5-4.1.0 version.
Please let me know following :
*
Hi Amit,
As per https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-5049299, this is fixed
in 7u55+ (including 8 fcs). There are some peculiarities however:
On JDK8 posix_spawn is the default on Solaris & Mac. vfork is the
default on Linux.
On JDK7u55+ posix_spawn is the default on Mac only. fork is the
Hi Amit,
I think this is the wrong place to ask. This list is about OpenJDK/OracleJDK.
As you can read from the bug report (better look at:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-5049299) there's a list in
which OpenJDK/OracleJDK versions this bug has been fixed.
It describes that this bug hasn
Lance,
Tristan is looking into adding an extension base class for about 60
tests that require file permission, then the current base class would
indeed set "minimal" permission. So please wait for his update :-)
Best,
Joe
On 12/30/2014 3:07 PM, Lance @ Oracle wrote:
Hi Tristan,
I will look
Hi Joe and Lance
Sorry for my late reply. I just uploaded the new webrev which is trying to
limit minimal permissions for most of tests. The new changeset has two base
classes; class JAXPBaseTest has only minimal set permissions; class
JAXPFileBaseTest adds two permissions that need access local
the Microsoft C Runtime Library makes use of this function in its
implementation of "rand_s", so it's removal would break a lot of
programs. I think this is a relative guarantee that the function is here
to stay.
Ok.
What are the fallbacks for SystemRandomImpl if /dev/urandom or the
rtlGenRa
Overall the direction seems promising. Poking at it a bit...
- ReadSerial methods are caller-sensitive and only show a class a view
of its own fields.
- Invariant checking is separate from deserialization, and does not
seem entirely built-in -- subclass constructors seem responsible for
ask
On 1/1/2015 12:22 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Brad,
Here's next webrev which tries to cover all your comments:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk9-dev/FileInputStreamPool.8047769/webrev.04/
I downloaded the webrev.05 (Chris' later followup email) and ran it
through JPRT. The only error
Hello all,
Thanks for the comments. A new patch is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/4026465/webrev.02/
On Dec 30, 2014, at 6:15 PM, joe darcy wrote:
> The new changes generally look good. A few comments, for the new code like
>
> 291 } else if ((off < 0) || (off > val.length) ||
11 matches
Mail list logo
