Hi Fabio,
Thanks for contributing the test. I created a JBS issue for this new
regression test:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158879
We will look into JDK-8156073 before including this regression test.
Mandy
> On Jun 6, 2016, at 3:06 PM, Fabio Tudone
Gentle reminder!!
On 6/3/2016 11:40 AM, shilpi.rast...@oracle.com wrote:
Thanks Vladimir and Joel!!
Please see http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~srastogi/8147585/webrev.04/
Added restriction for synthetic methods as well.
On 6/2/2016 5:04 PM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
On 6/2/16 12:02 AM, Joel
Hi,
On 05/06/16 19:17, Jeff Hain wrote:
>
> While playing around with Math.round(double) code,
> I found out that
>
> if (longBits < 0) {
> r = -r;
> }
>
> can be replaced with:
>
> long bitsSignum = (((longBits >> 63) << 1) + 1); // 2*0+1 = 1, or 2*-1+1 = -1
> r *= bitsSignum;
>
>
Hello!
It was noticed that objects of an internal class SimpleClientId that are
equal (in terms of equals() method) can have different hash codes.
This happens when the password is represented with an array, so
passwd.hashCode() produces unique value even when the content is same.
Some minor
Hello,
As a general comment, the Java microbenching version of "Pics or it
didn't happen" should be "jmh or it isn't faster" ;-)
As Andrew's other comment notes, the performance details can be
processor and platform specific so discerning small performance
differences really needs to be
+ 1
On 06/02/2016 05:03 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:
Hi,
Please review the proposed fix to this issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146156
The fix is located at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8146156/webrev.00/
The fix is to use the default locale for formatting where applicable.
Could someone please help review this simple backport?
Thanks in advance,
Ivan
On 29.05.2016 21:08, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
As this has to be re-reviewed, sending the request to net-dev list as
well.
On 27.05.2016 16:46, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hello!
I'd like to backport the fix to
Thanks for that response, Stuart. One comment inline...
On 5/31/16 5:34 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
On 5/30/16 11:48 AM, Richard Hillegas wrote:
Dalibor Topic recommended that I post this feedback on core-libs-dev.
This is my
feedback after ameliorating the deprecation warnings which surfaced
>As Andrew's other comment notes, the performance details can be
>processor and platform specific so discerning small performance
>differences really needs to be data-driven.
Then here is some data for my configuration (Jdk8u92/Win7/Core i7 4770S):
// arg = 123456.789:
Benchmark
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the proposal. This feature has been lacking. When this subject was
brought, I also have similiar thought to provide a way in Proxy class for
InvocationHandler to invoke a default method (but of course no time to put into
it).
I appreciate your contribution and good work.
Hi,
I'd like to contribute a jtreg test (attached) that highlights
StackWalker issues about decoding qword (i.e. "long" and "double") frame
locals and being able to read frame locals consistently in every
situation, in particular regardless of the execution mode.
The test is a single Java
Hello,
The test
45 void testAnnotationWithLambda() {
46 Method[] methods =
AnnotationWithLambda.MethodsWithAnnotations.class.getDeclaredMethods();
47 for (Method method : methods) {
48 assertEquals(1, method.getDeclaredAnnotations().length);
49
Hi Shilpi,
CCC approval is in. My review is lower-case, so another one is needed ere I can
sponsor the push.
Best,
Michael
> Am 02.06.2016 um 14:53 schrieb Michael Haupt :
>
> Hi Shilpi,
>
> lower-case thumbs up. Please obtain CCC approval for this change.
>
>
Looks good
-Sundar
On 6/6/2016 12:16 PM, Michael Haupt wrote:
> Hi Shilpi,
>
> CCC approval is in. My review is lower-case, so another one is needed ere I
> can sponsor the push.
>
> Best,
>
> Michael
>
>> Am 02.06.2016 um 14:53 schrieb Michael Haupt :
>>
>> Hi
14 matches
Mail list logo