Hi Christian,
have you looked at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.commonPool()?
/Claes
On 2016-08-08 00:51, Christian Schulte wrote:
Hello,
whenever I need to update an existing codebase to add some kind of
parallelization, I am in the need of an executor matching the number of
processors
David is right about common pool not being a general-purpose executor.
However, its intent is slightly broader than “just for streams”; it is intended
as a general-purpose FJ Pool for any library that wants to spew parallel
calculations into a shared FJPool and be a good citizen. Creating
Hi Christian,
On 8/08/2016 9:16 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi Christian,
have you looked at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.commonPool()?
That isn't quite the same thing as a general shared executor.
/Claes
On 2016-08-08 00:51, Christian Schulte wrote:
Hello,
whenever I need to update
Hello,
whenever I need to update an existing codebase to add some kind of
parallelization, I am in the need of an executor matching the number of
processors available at runtime. Most of the time I end up using
something like:
On 8/08/2016 10:04 AM, Brian Goetz wrote:
David is right about common pool not being a general-purpose executor.
However, its intent is slightly broader than “just for streams”; it is
intended as a general-purpose FJ Pool for any library that wants to spew
parallel calculations into a shared
