I think that was meant to read “After this method returns _true_, subsequent
calls …”
David
From: Concurrency-interest [mailto:concurrency-interest-boun...@cs.oswego.edu]
On Behalf Of Viktor Klang
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 9:03 PM
To: Martin Buchholz
Cc: concurrency-interest ; cor
Hi Alan,
The modules list in mrar/TEST.properties guarantee that jtreg add
"--add-module @modules" command line option during test execution. If
you create custom JRE that does not contains the modules, the tests
fails. The proposed fix guarantee that jtreg skips the tests if no
listed module
If that truely is the case then the only way of implementing a readonly
Future is by throwing an exception from cancel...
--
Cheers,
√
On Sep 25, 2016 4:20 PM, "Joe Bowbeer" wrote:
> This statement regarding what happens after cancel is called is correct:
>
> "*After this method returns, subse
On 25/09/2016 13:53, Sergei Kovalev wrote:
Hi Alan,
The modules list in mrar/TEST.properties guarantee that jtreg add
"--add-module @modules" command line option during test execution. If
you create custom JRE that does not contains the modules, the tests
fails. The proposed fix guarantee th
On 24/09/2016 18:57, Mandy Chung wrote:
You can run jdeps --check java.xml.ws on your local build with this change.
This will analyze the dependences and any unused qualified exports.
Good idea. I think java.activation's module-info.java will need updating
too as it no longer requires java.de
Hi Alan,
Here is the result of one of the tests run in initial state (no fix applied)
1) no module limitation
jtreg -jdk:/home/skovalev/TRASH/jdk-9 -verbose:all
/home/skovalev/repos/jake/jdk/test/java/util/jar/JarFile/mrjar/MultiReleaseJarAPI.java
TEST RESULT: Passed. Execution successful
2
On 25/09/2016 16:05, Sergei Kovalev wrote:
Hi Alan,
Here is the result of one of the tests run in initial state (no fix
applied)
For #2 and #3 then jtreg should ignore the test because they require
jdk.compiler and jdk.jartool (declared in TEST.properties). This is why
I'm wondering if we ha
If I've drop jdk.jartool, I faced with ClassNotFound error as I showed in #3
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: jdk.security.jarsigner.JarSigner$Builder
As you can see TEST.properties contains both: jdk.compiler and jdk.jartool
25.09.16 18:13, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 25/09/2016 16:05, Sergei K
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Viktor Klang
wrote:
> If that truely is the case then the only way of implementing a readonly
> Future is by throwing an exception from cancel...
>
We the maintainers of j.u.c.Future have always thought that canceling a
Future will surely leave it completed. Of c
Joe,
That is ignoring the error case. If the cancel fails then it is not complete
and it is not cancelled. We added the extra wording back in August 2005. It is
interesting to note that Martin’s initial query then only related to the state
of the thread, but that it was clear about things on
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Viktor Klang
wrote:
>
> PS. As a sidenote, Martin, and in all friendliness, "actor purist API"?
> C'mon, I know you're better than that! CompletionStage's design has nothing
> to do with Actors and if Single Responsibility Principle is considered
> purism then I'm
Hi Alan, Joe, Mandy, Roman,
Suggested changes to the comment section (will bring this change to
standalone JAXB) and to the exported internal API were made:
com.sun.xml.internal.stream.writers,
com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.resolver,
com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.resolver.tools dependencie
Hi Aleks,
I still would suggest not pointing at jaxb.java.net for the specification given
these projects are going to have to migrate elsewhere.
Best
Lance
> On Sep 25, 2016, at 7:41 PM, Aleks Efimov wrote:
>
> Hi Alan, Joe, Mandy, Roman,
>
> Suggested changes to the comment section (will bri
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 2:22 PM, David Holmes
wrote:
>
> Yet we somehow added the clarification with no regard as to whether cancel
> returned true or not. That seems wrong.
>
Yikes! I had always assumed that cancel was not permitted to leave the
Future incomplete, perhaps influenced by the wor
14 matches
Mail list logo
