Hi,
On 01/19/2017 04:58 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
I extended the AnnotationVerifier test with additional cases that
cover various "wrongs" in annotation types:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk9-dev/8173056_AnnotationVerifier/webrev.01/
My plan is to 1st get this test in as a separate
Hi Peter,
this looks good to me (and enhancements to existing tests are
allowed even though we're in rampdown).
As you've also clarified that only behavior for annotations that javac
wouldn't have allowed in the first place have changed I retract my
reservations against the fix for 8029019 - but
On 21/01/2017 20:41, Xueming Shen wrote:
Erik, Alan
Here is the webrev that dropped the version number from the name.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8173140/webrev
Switching to zlib looks good although it's impossible to see the changes
in this webrev because all the files show up as ne
On 1/22/17, 9:46 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 21/01/2017 20:41, Xueming Shen wrote:
Erik, Alan
Here is the webrev that dropped the version number from the name.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8173140/webrev
Switching to zlib looks good although it's impossible to see the
changes in this
Would you please review the below patch?
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171142
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mli/8171142/webrev.00/
Thank you
-Hamlin
