On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:00:00 GMT, Leo Jiang wrote:
> This is the changes for JDK 16 msg drop 10.
[webrev.tar.gz](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk16/files/5814846/webrev.tar.gz)
Since they're Unicode escape sequences in the l10n resource files, so I
attached a human readable webrev, created by
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:39:17 GMT, Peter Levart wrote:
>> Hi @stsypanov,
>>
>>> The **behavior** of this convenience method is **identical** to that of
>>> c.addAll(Arrays.asList(elements))
>>
>> What about:
>>
>>> The **behaviour** of this convenience method is **similar** to that of
>>>
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 03:31:44 GMT, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> 8254350: CompletableFuture.get may swallow InterruptedException
@Martin-Buchholz @DougLea @AlanBateman Sorry for rough in. After change
`future.get()` to `future.get(1, TimeUnit.DAYS)`,
`SwallowedInterruptedException` failed.
This is the changes for JDK 16 msg drop 10.
-
Commit messages:
- JDK-8259732: JDK 16 L10n resource file update - msg drop 10
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16/pull/123/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk16=123=00
Issue:
> This is the changes for JDK 16 msg drop 10.
Leo Jiang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by
the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the
last
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 06:32:37 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
> This is the security libs portion of the effort to replace
> archaic/non-inclusive words with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for
> details).
>
> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
> changed as
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:41:05 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the fix to this issue. Unused thread local StringCoding.Result
> is now wrapped with SoftReference, which can be GC'ed as needed. I confirmed
> it worked as expected with a test case
>
> Hello, I feel like this was previously discussed in
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/ but since I cannot
> find original mail I post this here.
>
> Currently `Collections.addAll()` is implemented and documented as:
> /**
> * ...
> * The behavior of this
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:39:17 GMT, Peter Levart wrote:
>> Hi @stsypanov,
>>
>>> The **behavior** of this convenience method is **identical** to that of
>>> c.addAll(Arrays.asList(elements))
>>
>> What about:
>>
>>> The **behaviour** of this convenience method is **similar** to that of
>>>
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:18:23 GMT, Peter Levart wrote:
>> ...but we could employ this method to guarantee more than
>> `c.addAll(Arrays.asList(elements))` does. So what about:
>>
>>> The behaviour of this convenience method is similar to that of
>>>
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:10:12 GMT, Leo Jiang wrote:
>> This is the changes for JDK 16 msg drop 10.
>
> [webrev.tar.gz](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk16/files/5814846/webrev.tar.gz)
>
> Since they're Unicode escape sequences in the l10n resource files, so I
> attached a human readable webrev,
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:41:05 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the fix to this issue. Unused thread local StringCoding.Result
> is now wrapped with SoftReference, which can be GC'ed as needed. I confirmed
> it worked as expected with a test case
>
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:27:25 GMT, Leo Jiang wrote:
>> This is the changes for JDK 16 msg drop 10.
>
> Leo Jiang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
> by the merge/rebase. The pull
> This is the security libs portion of the effort to replace
> archaic/non-inclusive words with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for
> details).
>
> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
> changed as follows:
>
> - blacklisted.certs -> blocked.certs (along
> Hello, I feel like this was previously discussed in
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/ but since I cannot
> find original mail I post this here.
>
> Currently `Collections.addAll()` is implemented and documented as:
> /**
> * ...
> * The behavior of this
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 06:32:37 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
> This is the security libs portion of the effort to replace
> archaic/non-inclusive words with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for
> details).
>
> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
> changed as
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 06:32:37 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
> This is the security libs portion of the effort to replace
> archaic/non-inclusive words with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for
> details).
>
> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
> changed as
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 06:32:37 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
> This is the security libs portion of the effort to replace
> archaic/non-inclusive words with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for
> details).
>
> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were
> changed as
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:45:43 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Jamil Nimeh has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Minor grammatical fixes
>
> src/java.base/share/conf/security/java.security line 455:
>
>> 453: #max_retries and
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:59:50 GMT, Kezhu Wang
wrote:
>> 8254350: CompletableFuture.get may swallow InterruptedException
>
> @Martin-Buchholz @DougLea @AlanBateman Sorry for rough in. After change
> `future.get()` to `future.get(1, TimeUnit.DAYS)`,
> `SwallowedInterruptedException` failed.
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:51:01 GMT, Tagir F. Valeev wrote:
> Handle TreeMap::computeIfAbsent when previous mapping with null value existed
> (in this case spec requires to overwrite the existing mapping)
Marked as reviewed by smarks (Reviewer).
-
PR:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 23:25:22 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> Handle TreeMap::computeIfAbsent when previous mapping with null value
>> existed (in this case spec requires to overwrite the existing mapping)
>
> Marked as reviewed by smarks (Reviewer).
Thanks for picking this up. Changes look good.
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:25:25 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
>> Hello, I feel like this was previously discussed in
>> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/ but since I cannot
>> find original mail I post this here.
>>
>> Currently `Collections.addAll()` is implemented and
> On 13. Jan 2021, at 17:50, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> [...]
> It's not clear to me whether NFC should be applied - or what would be
> the consequences of applying NFC there (or not).
While I can't answer this question, it may be worth mentioning RFC 3987 which
might not be directly
Please review a small patch to enable LDAP TLS Channel Binding with StartTLS
Extension.
Test from the bug report and jtreg javax/naming tests are passed.
-
Commit messages:
- 8259707: LDAP channel binding does not work with StartTLS extension
Changes:
Hello,
Please reply if anyone can be a sponsor.
Regards,
Masanori Yano
> -Original Message-
> From: Yano, Masanori
> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 5:01 PM
> To: 'core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net'
> Subject: [PING] RE: 8250678: ModuleDescriptor.Version parsing treats empty
>
Fixed compilation issues with the test. Test compiles and runs fine locally.
-
Commit messages:
- 8259814: test/jdk/tools/jlink/plugins/CompressorPluginTest.java has
compilation issues
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2091/files
Webrev:
> Handle TreeMap::computeIfAbsent when previous mapping with null value existed
> (in this case spec requires to overwrite the existing mapping)
Tagir F. Valeev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Copyright year updated
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:51:01 GMT, Tagir F. Valeev wrote:
> Handle TreeMap::computeIfAbsent when previous mapping with null value existed
> (in this case spec requires to overwrite the existing mapping)
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 2c8e337d
Author:Tagir F. Valeev
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:19:11 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Leo Jiang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits
>>
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 22:16:12 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> I cannot create CSRs, only members can. Deprecating and switching to another
>> function results in much more work for users overall because it affects all
>> those who use it correctly as well. In other words: 100%
>>
>> I'm in favor of
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 05:19:44 GMT, Athijegannathan Sundararajan
wrote:
> Fixed compilation issues with the test. Test compiles and runs fine locally.
Are you going to remove it from the exclude list (test/jdk/ProblemList.txt)? I
skimmed through the changes and it looks fine but would like
32 matches
Mail list logo
