On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 10:05:43 GMT, Andrew Leonard wrote:
>> Add a new --source-date (epoch seconds) option to jar and jmod
>> to allow specification of time to use for created/updated jar/jmod entries.
>> This then allows the ability to make the content deterministic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre
Exploratory builds indicate it is not currently necessary to exclude the
doclint accessibility checks; this patch enables them.
(Enabling the reference checks is left for future work.)
-
Commit messages:
- JDK-8278273: Remove unnecessary exclusion of doclint accessibility checks
C
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 10:05:43 GMT, Andrew Leonard wrote:
>> Add a new --source-date (epoch seconds) option to jar and jmod
>> to allow specification of time to use for created/updated jar/jmod entries.
>> This then allows the ability to make the content deterministic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 18:19:05 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> The effects of invalid values of `jdk.serialFilter` and
> `jdk.serialFilterFactory` properties are
> incompletely specified. The behavior for invalid values of the properties is
> different and
> use an unconventional exception type, `Excep
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 04:25:37 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> The effects of invalid values of `jdk.serialFilter` and
>> `jdk.serialFilterFactory` properties are
>> incompletely specified. The behavior for invalid values of the properties is
>> different and
>> use an unconventional exception type,
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 23:45:32 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Exploratory builds indicate it is not currently necessary to exclude the
> doclint accessibility checks; this patch enables them.
>
> (Enabling the reference checks is left for future work.)
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
---
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 23:45:32 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Exploratory builds indicate it is not currently necessary to exclude the
> doclint accessibility checks; this patch enables them.
>
> (Enabling the reference checks is left for future work.)
Marked as reviewed by alanb (Reviewer).
--
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 22:01:33 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> This PR-*draft* is **work in progress** and an invitation to discuss a
>> possible solution for issue
>> [JDK-8265891](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265891). It is *not
>> yet* intended for a final review.
>>
>> As proposed in
