On 10/13/2011 01:11 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Charles,
On 13/10/2011 2:54 PM, Charles Lee wrote:
Thanks Alan. Below is the patch I am failed to attach. It is trivial...
Do you need someone to sponsor this for you, or are you able to drive
this via other IBM folk that can generate webrevs
I think I seen in a previous mail that you didn't have access to Solaris
machines? I'll grab your patch, apply to a latest jdk8 TL repo and do
some sanity builds on Solaris if you like?
-Chris.
On 10/13/11 01:43 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Neil Richards wrote:
:
Will there need to be two bug
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 14:03 +0100, Chris Hegarty wrote:
I think I seen in a previous mail that you didn't have access to Solaris
machines? I'll grab your patch, apply to a latest jdk8 TL repo and do
some sanity builds on Solaris if you like?
-Chris.
Hi Chris,
Thank you, that would be
Changeset: 2b27e14a4c82
Author:vinnie
Date: 2011-10-13 12:00 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/2b27e14a4c82
7099228: Use a PKCS11 config attribute to control encoding of an EC point
Reviewed-by: valeriep, mullan
!
Am 11.10.2011 19:49, schrieb Xueming Shen:
I don't know which one is better, I did a run on
private static boolean op1(int b) {
return (b 6) != -2;
}
private static boolean op2(int b) {
return (b 0xc0) != 0x80;
}
private static boolean op3(byte b) {
Neil,
All builds complete with your patches (on top of the latest JDK8 TL
repo) from :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ngmr/ojdk-243.1/webrev.01/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ngmr/ojdk-243.2/webrev.00/
solaris_sparc_5.10-product
solaris_sparcv9_5.10-product
solaris_i586_5.10-product
Changeset: 01615d3e74ed
Author:mullan
Date: 2011-10-13 13:50 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/01615d3e74ed
6953295: Move few sun.security.{util, x509, pkcs} classes used by
keytool/jarsigner to another package
Reviewed-by: mchung
!
On 10/13/2011 09:55 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 11.10.2011 19:49, schrieb Xueming Shen:
I don't know which one is better, I did a run on
private static boolean op1(int b) {
return (b 6) != -2;
}
private static boolean op2(int b) {
return (b 0xc0) != 0x80;
}
Hi Patrick, David,
David - I tried your suggestions, and I agree it must be faster, but it is in
the noise of my test env. not very satisfactory
Patrick - Unfortunately Appendable doesn't provide all of the interface that
you need. All of the methods throw IOException and you cannot
Am 14.10.11 01:06, schrieb Mike Skells:
Hi Patrick, David,
David - I tried your suggestions, and I agree it must be faster, but
it is in the noise of my test env. not very satisfactory
Patrick - Unfortunately Appendable doesn't provide all of the
interface that you need. All of the
10 matches
Mail list logo
