Hi all,
On 4/25/12 12:07 PM, Stefan Reich wrote:
Hello,
is there any interest to accept change sets based on OpenJDK 7 that update
the java classes in jdk/src/share/classes to use
* multi-catch
* string switch statements as opposed to nested if statements when
comparing strings with
Changeset: c22b2f9066dd
Author:alanb
Date: 2012-05-01 11:17 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c22b2f9066dd
7164570: (fs) WatchService queues CREATE event but not DELETE event for very
short lived files [sol11]
Reviewed-by: chegar
!
On 04/30/2012 11:03 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Apr 28, 2012, at 1:01 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Hi Jim,
Yes, I've basically try to submit a patch each time I've written a method join
in one of my application :)
The funny think (in fact it's even not funny) is that I think that this methods
should
Changeset: 71fdf32fdc65
Author:xuelei
Date: 2012-05-01 03:48 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/71fdf32fdc65
7158688: Typo in SSLContext Spec
Reviewed-by: weijun, wetmore
! src/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/SSLContext.java
On 05/01/2012 12:09 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Hi Rémi,
Am 28.04.2012 00:42, schrieb Rémi Forax:
While you are there:
IntegerCache.cache/high/low are static final, so should be named
_upper case_.
Not done because the system property is also spelled in lower case.
Hm, but does that justify
Here is the new webrev with the assert move after line 777 as Joe ask.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~forax/integer_valueof2/
Alan or Joe, it let you commit it if there is no new issue.
Rémi
On 04/30/2012 06:09 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 27/04/2012 23:38, Rémi Forax wrote:
:
I have moved the
On May 1, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
On 04/30/2012 11:03 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Apr 28, 2012, at 1:01 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Hi Jim,
Yes, I've basically try to submit a patch each time I've written a method
join
in one of my application :)
The funny think (in fact it's
On 05/01/2012 01:37 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On May 1, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
On 04/30/2012 11:03 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Apr 28, 2012, at 1:01 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Hi Jim,
Yes, I've basically try to submit a patch each time I've written a
method join
in one of my
Hi all,
On 1 May 2012 10:33, Martijn Verburg martijnverb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
On 4/25/12 12:07 PM, Stefan Reich wrote:
Hello,
is there any interest to accept change sets based on OpenJDK 7 that update
the java classes in jdk/src/share/classes to use
* multi-catch
* string switch
Hi,
Just noticed that webrev url was pointing to the blenderrev. The webrev
is at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/7014640/webrev
Btw, this one has been approved by CCC.
thanks,
-Sherman
On 04/21/2012 12:56 AM, Xueming Shen wrote:
Hi
Here are the webrev and blenderrev for the proposed
Hi Stuart,
thank you for your reply. I sent a patch to the adopt-openjdk group that uses
multi-catch for catch clauses with duplicate code blocks in the same try
statement (message and patch attached). That patch covers all code in
src/shared/classes. Martijn will help coordinating the effort
Changeset: 83fac66442cf
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-04-26 14:05 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/corba/rev/83fac66442cf
Added tag jdk8-b36 for changeset a5a61f259961
! .hgtags
Changeset: 4a653e435441
Author:lana
Date: 2012-05-01 11:29 -0700
URL:
Changeset: b05a948db1b6
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-04-26 14:06 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxws/rev/b05a948db1b6
Added tag jdk8-b36 for changeset 89b36c658e39
! .hgtags
Changeset: c388369cf4da
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-04-26 14:06 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxp/rev/c388369cf4da
Added tag jdk8-b36 for changeset cfd288fe1d3e
! .hgtags
Changeset: bfcf92bfefb8
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-04-26 14:05 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/hotspot/rev/bfcf92bfefb8
Added tag jdk8-b36 for changeset 50b4400ca1ec
! .hgtags
Changeset: 5891b38985e8
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-04-26 14:07 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/5891b38985e8
Added tag jdk8-b36 for changeset 94bbaa67686f
! .hgtags
Changeset: 9e82ac15ab80
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-04-26 14:07 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/9e82ac15ab80
Added tag jdk8-b36 for changeset 45da9cb055ee
! .hgtags
Changeset: 6c9c3d7ce9e2
Author:lana
Date: 2012-05-01 11:30 -0700
URL:
Hi,
This is a simple fix to enable AbstractPreferences.remove() to check
for a null argument and
throw a NullPointerException if required.
I have also modified test/java/util/prefs/RemoveNullKeyCheck.java to
cover this case.
Bug:
Hi all,
Is there some reason for not using #valueOf-methods from wrapper classes
in Unsafe-based FieldAccessors in sun.reflect-package (see the attached patch)?
The main motivation for this patch is to reduce memory consumption in
applications
which make heavy use of reflection API (e.g. apps
On 05/01/2012 09:33 PM, Andrej Golovnin wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Andrej,
your far from Swing :)
(I remember you from the glorious appframework time)
Is there some reason for not using #valueOf-methods from wrapper classes
in Unsafe-based FieldAccessors in sun.reflect-package (see the attached
Changeset: 46e0bd218fcc
Author:mchung
Date: 2012-05-01 19:45 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/46e0bd218fcc
7164376: Replace use of sun.security.action.LoadLibraryAction with
System.loadLibrary
Reviewed-by: alanb, mullan, prr
!
Hi Kurchi,
You should also add:
@throws NullPointerException {@inheritDoc}
to the method spec so that the docs re-instate the fact that it is
supposed to throw NPE. As it stands I could argue that
AbstractPreferences.remove has chosen not to throw NPE for a null key -
leaving it up to
22 matches
Mail list logo
