Reflection.getCallerClass(3) seems work but the method is deprecated.
Thanks
Max
On 03/24/2014 08:43 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
Reflection.getCallerClass(3) seems work but the method is deprecated.
Thanks
Max
what is your the question ?
cheers,
Rémi
Calling Reflection.getCallerClass() needs the @CallerSensitive annotation, but
it cannot be applied to a constructor.
--Max
On Mar 24, 2014, at 16:36, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
On 03/24/2014 08:43 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
Reflection.getCallerClass(3) seems work but the method is
On 03/20/2014 08:49 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 03/20/2014 11:06 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
I was thinking about last night, for question: Why is this
double-checked non-volatile-then-volatile trick not any faster than pure
volatile variant even on ARM platform where volatile read should have
On 22 Mar 2014, at 03:22, Mandy Chung mandy.ch...@oracle.com wrote:
Good catch Sherman.
Vinnie - what's your recommendation for this LDAP change having both
encode/decode uses the platform default charset (rather than retaining the
old interop issue)? It's an incompatible change and
How does IS_JNI_TRUE sound?
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 3/23/2014 10:10 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 21/03/2014 15:22, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 3/21/14 7:10 PM, roger riggs wrote:
The macro would just as useful (if I understand the cases) without
the cast.
How useful is a simple definition
On 2014-03-21 10:36, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
(c) Compression mode:
1. none
2. per-section compression, SHF_GNU_COMPRESSED [1]
3. zip entire file
Is 2 something we're doing? I couldn't find any references to it in the
code. Or is it something we're planning to do?
/Magnus
Hi,
Simple patch to align code with spec for stream/spliterator factory methods on
Arrays and spliterator methods on Spliterators, and make the next release of
the JCK happy:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk9/JDK-8037857-spliterator-aioob/webrev/
After 9 it should go back to 8u20.
On 24/03/2014 11:44, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi,
Simple patch to align code with spec for stream/spliterator factory methods on
Arrays and spliterator methods on Spliterators, and make the next release of
the JCK happy:
On Mar 24, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote:
On 24/03/2014 11:44, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi,
Simple patch to align code with spec for stream/spliterator factory methods
on Arrays and spliterator methods on Spliterators, and make the next release
of the JCK happy:
On 24/03/2014 08:41, Wang Weijun wrote:
Calling Reflection.getCallerClass() needs the @CallerSensitive annotation, but
it cannot be applied to a constructor.
Ah, I see your message from 2012-11-26 05:46.
This is very nice but it does not mention Constructor.newInstance().
In fact, I do
The changes look good to me Mandy.
-Chris.
On 21/03/14 21:28, Mandy Chung wrote:
This is the second patch to eliminate the dependencies to
sun.security.action:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038177
Webrev at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8038177/webrev.00/
On 21/03/2014 21:28, Mandy Chung wrote:
This is the second patch to eliminate the dependencies to
sun.security.action:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038177
Webrev at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8038177/webrev.00/
It looks good to me too. The only one that I
Updated version:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8037210/webrev.03/
- changed the way how arrays of types are created:
static final BasicType[] ALL_TYPES = BasicType.values();
static final BasicType[] ARG_TYPES = Arrays.copyOf(ALL_TYPES,
ALL_TYPES.length-1);
- added a
Updated version:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8037209/webrev.01/
Changes:
- rebased to enum-based BasicType;
- decided to integrate changes for typed array getters/setters
separately;
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 3/14/14 8:36 PM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Doh! crossed webrevs,
I started working on a patch to remove the monitor related methods on Unsafe,
and was thinking this is gonna be easy, it kind of is, but there is some
curious code for the registration of the native methods:
Hi Paul,
I would guess this is because of the HSX model where we could use the same VM
with different majors of the JDK. Would that make sense?
cheers
/Joel
On 24 Mar 2014, at 17:42, Paul Sandoz paul.san...@oracle.com wrote:
I started working on a patch to remove the monitor related methods
Hi Peter,
On Mar 22, 2014, at 2:01 AM, Peter Levart peter.lev...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks good. Just a nit. In the following method:
3726 private static void matchScale(BigDecimal[] val) {
I concur.
One of 3 ifs is superfluous. Either the 1st one:
private static void
Hi Peter,
On Mar 24, 2014, at 2:21 AM, Peter Levart peter.lev...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to Aleksey for re-establishing the access, I bring you results of the
microbenchmark from his quad-core Cortex-A9:
Thanks to you and Aleksey for taking the initiative to test on that platform.
...as
On 03/24/2014 07:02 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Mar 24, 2014, at 6:37 PM, Joel Borggrén-Franck joel.fra...@oracle.com
wrote:
Hi Paul,
I would guess this is because of the HSX model where we could use the same VM
with different majors of the JDK. Would that make sense?
I was wondering about
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8038261/webrev.00
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038261
56 lines changed: 26 ins; 14 del; 16 mod
Cache typed array element getters/setters and reuse them.
Initially, it was part of 8037209, but I decided to integrate it
separately.
Hi Stephen,
The webrev has been updated accordingly.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8033662/webrev/
Thanks!
-Sherman
On 03/24/2014 08:59 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
I don't think think email was delivered to me. (And I think another from you
also wasn't). The email is in the
On 03/24/2014 06:52 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Peter Levart peter.lev...@gmail.com
mailto:peter.lev...@gmail.com wrote:
What would the following cost?
private transient String stringCache;
public String toString() {
On Mar 24, 2014, at 6:37 PM, Joel Borggrén-Franck joel.fra...@oracle.com
wrote:
Hi Paul,
I would guess this is because of the HSX model where we could use the same VM
with different majors of the JDK. Would that make sense?
I was wondering about too, but does that still apply to JDKs
We have abandoned the HSX model. From JDK 8 one version of Hotspot will be tied
to one version of the JDK. This looks like old code that has not been cleaned
up.
/Staffan
On 24 mar 2014, at 19:13, Peter Levart peter.lev...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/24/2014 07:02 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Mar
I'm happy with this updated patch.
Stephen
On 24 March 2014 18:24, Xueming Shen xueming.s...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Stephen,
The webrev has been updated accordingly.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8033662/webrev/
Thanks!
-Sherman
On 03/24/2014 08:59 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
On Mar 24 2014, at 12:25 , Martin Buchholz marti...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Peter Levart peter.lev...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/24/2014 06:52 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Peter Levart peter.lev...@gmail.com wrote:
What
Hi all,
Please review the patch:
Problems:
- MethodHandlesTest::testCatchException() doesn't provide enough testing
of j.l.i.MethodHandles::catchException().
- MethodHandlesTest contains more than 3k lines, an auxiliary code
together w/ a test code, many methods aren't connected w/ each
Hi,
For now I would just use the explicit ternary operator.
The macro would have a very narrow use.
Improving the ability to do static checking on JNI types would be a
larger undertaking.
Roger
On 3/21/2014 5:38 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
What if we just abandon adding an IS_TRUE /
Hi Rob, Martin, et.al.
I've prototyped (for 9) a thread reaper[1] that uses a single thread to
wait for exiting
processes and calling back to the process with the exit status.
the interesting part is getting the exit status back to the Process that
needs it
It needs more testing and
Hi,
I'm starting to work on JEP 102, Process API Updates for JDK 9.
The use cases identified include test execution and build systems such
as Jtreg and Hudson/Jenkins. And there is a use-case for using Java
to monitor the health of a more complex system where the processes
are not spawned by the
31 matches
Mail list logo
