+1
-Sundar
On 12/01/18, 10:21 AM, Amy Lu wrote:
Please review this minor test-tag-only change to move bugid from @test
to @bug
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194959
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amlu/8194959/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Amy
Please review this minor test-tag-only change to move bugid from @test
to @bug
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194959
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amlu/8194959/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Amy
MethodHandle.invokeExact() can match the performance of direct invocation, but
it requires constant folding to do so. Otherwise results are similar to Java
reflection(e.g [1]).
While TrustFinalNonStaticFields can be used, it’s a sledgehammer where a
scalpel is really be more appropriate.
The
Hi,
Please review bug fixes for 2 test bugs, which fails with a base Linux
installation
in a docker container.
Thanks
Kumar
[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8194287/webrev-00/
[2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8194287/cmt.txt
Thanks. The final version is updated in place under webrev.03. Pushing the
change is pending CSR-reapproval.
Brian
On Jan 11, 2018, at 11:16 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
> +1 looks fine
>
> On 1/11/2018 11:59 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> While there appears now to be agreement on using naming opt
Hi Naoto,
Looks fine.
Thanks
On 1/10/2018 2:04 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:
Hello,
Please review a simple test fix to the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194148
The proposed changeset is located at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8194148/webrev.00/
The gist of the i
+1 looks fine
On 1/11/2018 11:59 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
While there appears now to be agreement on using naming option C below, formal
Reviewer approval appears still to be lacking. It would be good if there were
at least two approvals forthcoming, if appropriate.
http://cr.openjdk.java.
While there appears now to be agreement on using naming option C below, formal
Reviewer approval appears still to be lacking. It would be good if there were
at least two approvals forthcoming, if appropriate.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/4358774/webrev.03/
Thanks,
Brian
On Jan 4, 2018, at
Hi Alan,
On 1/11/2018 11:14 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 11/01/2018 15:19, Roger Riggs wrote:
Please review a fix for a missing entry in the mapfiles. The missing
entry point
caused the closing of unreferenced FileDescriptors to be skipped.
Looks good.
The tests for FileInputStream, File
On 11/01/2018 15:19, Roger Riggs wrote:
Please review a fix for a missing entry in the mapfiles. The missing
entry point
caused the closing of unreferenced FileDescriptors to be skipped.
Looks good.
The tests for FileInputStream, FileOutputStream, and RandomAccess file
unreferenced
File
Please review a fix for a missing entry in the mapfiles. The missing
entry point
caused the closing of unreferenced FileDescriptors to be skipped.
The tests for FileInputStream, FileOutputStream, and RandomAccess file
unreferenced
FileDescriptors have been updated to verify the raw fds have b
Hi Joe,
I have revised this webrev to include your feedback and also updated
this CSR.
Kindly have a look at :
CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8191414
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rgoel/8146656/webrev.01/
Thanks,
Rachna
On 20/12/17 10:44 PM, joe darcy wrote:
Hi Rac
12 matches
Mail list logo