Thanks Lance.
Upon advice from Pavel Rappo, I've adjusted the link markup to use the full
reference form of a javadoc link. Revised patch below. Also, could you review
the CSR?
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8242406
Thanks,
s'marks
# HG changeset patch
# User smarks
# Date
+1
Naoto
On 4/9/20 2:28 PM, Joe Wang wrote:
Please review an update to Xerces 2.12.1. Xerces 2.12.1 was a bug fix
release. Bugs in the release were either already in the JDK or not
applicable. This patch therefore includes only an update to the md file.
---
+1
> On Apr 9, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Joe Wang wrote:
>
> Please review an update to Xerces 2.12.1. Xerces 2.12.1 was a bug fix
> release. Bugs in the release were either already in the JDK or not
> applicable. This patch therefore includes only an update to the md file.
>
> ---
Please review an update to Xerces 2.12.1. Xerces 2.12.1 was a bug fix
release. Bugs in the release were either already in the JDK or not
applicable. This patch therefore includes only an update to the md file.
--- a/src/java.xml/share/legal/xerces.md
+++ b/src/java.xml/share/legal/xerces.md
@@
Hi Pavel,
On 4/9/2020 3:46 AM, Pavel Rappo wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8225540.1/
I'm not an expert in this area, but AFAIK this looks good.
A couple of nits.
1. The newly added text in the top-level doc comment for AnnotatedElement is missing
some tags. It looks nice in
Reference.java
—
335 *
336 * @return The object to which this reference refers, or
337 * {@code null} if this reference object has been cleared
Add @see refersTo
338 */
339 @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate
340 public T get() {
Paul.
> On Apr 7, 2020, at
Please review a few cleanups I missed on the removal of rmic.
I didn't get a reply on the changes to the hotspot (cds) tests.
(I did get an ok on the javadoc changes)
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-remove-rmic-8225319-misc-1/
Issue:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8225540.1/
I'm not an expert in this area, but AFAIK this looks good.
A couple of nits.
1. The newly added text in the top-level doc comment for AnnotatedElement is
missing some tags. It looks nice in source, but it won't be like that in
the output. (For
Hi Claes and Mark,
thanks again for your inputs.
I'll push this with Claes' review then.
Best regards
Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: core-libs-dev On Behalf
> Of Claes Redestad
> Sent: Mittwoch, 8. April 2020 00:12
> To: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR:
