On 4/18/20 12:47 AM, Chris Plummer wrote:
It's a link to
https://download.java.net/java/early_access/jdk15/docs/specs/jni/types.html#type-signatures.
This is how the current JVM TI spec defines.
Since it looks like this reference was present before your changes, I
guess it's ok to leave
On 18/04/2020 00:13, Ivanov, Vladimir A wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would like to add support for the Application Device Queue (ADQ) technology
to the JDK.
The JBS entry and webrev were created for this improvement:
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8243099
Webrev:
Without commenting on the merits of the proposal, let me point out that asking
for a sponsor at this point is skipping many important steps.
I would recommend you focus first on *building consensus* that (a) there is a
problem, (b) you have identified the correct problem, (c) it is a problem
Sundar - do you recognize this? I assume truncating this test to 0 bytes
was a mistake but I can't tell if the test should be brought back or not
(to ensure that`jlink --order-resources` is tested).
-Alan
On 17/04/2020 11:34, Ao Qi wrote:
Hi,
The original email is waiting for moderator
Hi Mandy,
Comments inline.
On 4/17/20 4:52 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 4/17/20 3:51 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Mandy,
Thanks for updating the svc specs. Some comments below:
In the JDWP spec update, you changed "JNI signature" to "type
signature" in one place, but left it as "JNI
On 4/17/20 9:37 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
On 4/17/20 16:52, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 4/17/20 3:51 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Mandy,
Thanks for updating the svc specs. Some comments below:
In the JDWP spec update, you changed "JNI signature" to "type
signature" in one place, but
