On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:38:35 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> This patch rewrites the prologue and epilogue of panama upcalls, in order to
>> fix the test failure from the title.
>>
>> Previously, we did a call to potentially attach the current thread to the
>> VM, and then afterwards did the same
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:30:32 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> here's a PR for a patch submitted on March 2020
>> [1](https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/4511638/webrev.04/) when Mercurial was
>> a thing.
>>
>> The patch has been edited to adhere to OpenJDK code conventions about
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:54:50 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> This patch rewrites the prologue and epilogue of panama upcalls, in order to
>> fix the test failure from the title.
>>
>> Previously, we did a call to potentially attach the current thread to the
>> VM, and then afterwards did the same
> This patch rewrites the prologue and epilogue of panama upcalls, in order to
> fix the test failure from the title.
>
> Previously, we did a call to potentially attach the current thread to the VM,
> and then afterwards did the same suspend and stack reguard checks that we do
> on the
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 23:43:38 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Sorry, I sent the wrong godbolt link: https://godbolt.org/z/1665fWzff
>
> @JornVernee I have small correct to your comment. We use simple inheritance
> for Thread subclasses. Their instances have **one** vtbl pointer at the same
>
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 02:12:20 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Jorn Vernee has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address David's review comments
>
> src/hotspot/share/prims/universalUpcallHandler.cpp line 62:
>
>> 60:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 12:07:42 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Removing unnecessary `@SuppressWarnings("exports")`. The reason for the
> suppress warnings was, as far as I can tell, removed by
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265137.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset:
> Hello, please review this PR; it extend the OSContainer API in order to also
> support the pids controller of cgroups.
>
> I noticed that unlike the other controllers "cpu", "cpuset", "cpuacct",
> "memory" on some older Linux distros (SLES 12.1, RHEL 7.1) the pids
> controller might not be
